McEnroe
2022
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 1.2 out of 10
You are here:
Nasty
Representation Score
5.1/10
Fair
2024
Director
Tudor D. Popescu, Cristian Pascariu, Tudor Giurgiu
Runtime
104 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Nasty is a biographical study of individualistic rebellion against institutionalized standards. It succeeds by centering a figure who disrupted the traditionalist, Western-centric etiquette of 1970s tennis. However, the film lacks explicit markers reflecting diverse identities. The narrative architecture remains heavily focused on male temperament, offering little visibility for LGBTQ+ identities or women's ability to drive the story within the sport's history. Ultimately, the documentary earns its score by elevating a non-traditional figure who challenged established social norms and systemic decorum.
Category Breakdown
Does Nasty have LGBTQ+ representation?
The documentary focuses on the professional trajectory and temperament of Ilie Nastase. There is no explicit mention of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives exploring non-straight relationships.
How does Nasty portray gender?
The narrative centers on the male-dominated sphere of 1970s professional tennis. The film explores the subversion of etiquette through the lens of male temperament and rebellion.
How racially and ethnically diverse is Nasty?
The film highlights a non-Anglo-Saxon influence within a traditionally homogeneous landscape. Nastase’s career represents a departure from the historically Anglo-centric dominance of tennis during the 1970s.
How does Nasty represent religion and culture?
The narrative prioritizes the celebration of anti-social behavior and the rejection of rigid social codes. It frames the disruption of sporting institutions as a form of individual liberation.
Does Nasty include disability representation?
There is no mention of characters or subjects navigating physical, neurodivergent, or mental health disabilities.
Present on Screen
- Highlights non-Anglo-Saxon influence in a historically homogeneous professional tennis landscape.
- Celebrates the deconstruction of rigid, traditionalist social codes and institutional hierarchies.
Limited or Absent
- Lacks visible representation of LGBTQ+ characters or non-straight narratives.
- Provides little evidence of women's ability to drive the story or the subversion of gender hierarchies.
Official Synopsis
1972 was a turning point in Ilie Nastase's career: he won his first US Open, while also reaching both Wimbledon and Davis Cup finals. Moving back and forth in time and featuring amazing archive footage and exclusive interviews with top athletes, the documentary explores Nastase's highs and lows, the controversies that surrounded him and the enduring impact he has had on the world of tennis. Lovable, charming and generous, yet temperamental, arrogant and obscene, Mr. Nice'n'Nasty disrupted the old-fashioned etiquette of the sport in the 70s thus becoming its first rebel rock star.
Where to Watch
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select or search, Escape to close.
Similar Movies
Anelka: Misunderstood
2020
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.7 out of 10
This Is What They Want
2013
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.3 out of 10
Messi
2014
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.3 out of 10
John McEnroe: In the Realm of Perfection
2018
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 0.7 out of 10
I Am Bolt
2016
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.1 out of 10
The French
1982
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 7.1 out of 10
The Figo Affair: The Transfer That Changed Football
2022
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.6 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.