
Laggies
2014

2012
RDirector
Lee Toland Krieger
Runtime
91 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Celeste and Jesse met in high school and got married young. They laugh at the same jokes and finish each other’s sentences. They are forever linked in their friends’ minds as the perfect couple – she, a high-powered businesswoman and budding novelist; he, a free spirit who keeps things from getting boring. Their only problem is that they have decided to get divorced. Can their perfect relationship withstand this minor setback?
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film operates within a strictly heteronormative framework. It lacks queer perspectives or non-cisnormative identities, adhering to conventional romantic structures throughout the primary character arcs.
Gender Representation
Celeste is depicted as a high-powered businesswoman and novelist, driving her own life trajectory. The film subverts male dominance by portraying Jesse as a free spirit with less economic stability.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast is predominantly white and middle-class, reflecting a homogeneous social environment. While Rashida Jones leads the film, race is not a central component of the characters' lived experiences.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story challenges the sanctity of the nuclear family by treating divorce as a necessary evolution of identity. It prioritizes individual emotional truth over the permanence of marital institutions.
Disability Representation
The narrative does not engage with physical or neurodivergent disabilities. No visible or invisible disabilities are portrayed within the central cast or plot.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The film excels at deconstructing traditional domestic hierarchies, placing female agency and intellectual autonomy at the forefront. By centering on a woman's professional and personal evolution, it avoids tired tropes of male-led stability. However, the narrative remains narrow in its social scope. It lacks intersectional breadth, offering almost no representation for LGBTQ+ individuals or people with disabilities. The setting feels insulated within a homogeneous, middle-class urban environment. Ultimately, the film is a focused character study of interpersonal change. While it offers a progressive view on the dissolution of marriage, it misses opportunities to engage with a broader spectrum of human identity.

2014

2018

2013

2010

2009

2014

2013

2010

2012

2011

2012

1992
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.