You are here:

Love Is Not What It Used to Be

Name: Love Is Not What It Used to Be
Director: Gabriel Ochoa
Released: 2013
Duration: 90 min

Representation Score

3.2/10

Limited

2013

Director

Gabriel Ochoa

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Love Is Not What It Used To Be is a conventional Spanish comedy that adheres closely to genre standards while avoiding social disruption. The film focuses on romantic clichés rather than exploring multi-layered identity issues. It emphasizes regional authenticity through its Mediterranean setting but does not offer broad ethnic diversity. While female actors play key roles, the narrative does not significantly challenge traditional gender roles or patriarchal structures.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Love Is Not What It Used to Be have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film follows a typical romantic comedy format without addressing non-cisgender identities or questioning the assumption that everyone is straight.

How does Love Is Not What It Used to Be portray gender?

Fair

The movie features several prominent female actors, but it doesn't clearly challenge traditional gender roles or masculine authority.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Love Is Not What It Used to Be?

Limited

The cast mainly consists of Mediterranean and Hispanic actors, reflecting the film's regional roots without much ethnic variety.

How does Love Is Not What It Used to Be represent religion and culture?

Fair

The story delves into modern relationships and attitudes but does not actively critique Western religious or family structures.

Does Love Is Not What It Used to Be include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no indication of characters with visible or invisible disabilities in the film.

Present on Screen

Established actors like Blanca Romero and Aida Folch bring strong female perspectives to the film.
The film accurately reflects the Mediterranean and Hispanic context of its origin.

Limited or Absent

The film misses the chance to include LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisgender identities.
It does not challenge traditional gender dynamics or patriarchal structures.
The cast lacks ethnic diversity, sticking to a predominantly regional makeup.

How are these scores produced? →