You are here:

Chevalier

Chevalier

Representation Score

5.2/10

Fair

2015

Unrated

Director

Athina Rachel Tsangari

Runtime

105 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Chevalier is an intellectually complex look at social rituals that prioritize deconstructing norms over broad demographic representation. It successfully challenges traditional gender hierarchies and critiques the performative nature of Western class structures through subtle hints. However, the film is limited by a lack of racial and ethnic diversity, focusing solely on a homogeneous, white aristocratic cast. This narrow focus restricts a more layered exploration of identity. Ultimately, the film excels in its deep analysis of masculinity and class, even as it remains focused on a specific, non-diverse social circle.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Chevalier have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film explores the tension between male rivalry and intimate connections through subtle hints. It portrays masculinity as a performance rather than a fixed trait.

How does Chevalier portray gender?

Good

The story breaks down traditional male hierarchies by showing masculinity as a series of anxious, unsteady performances. It highlights the fragile and empty nature of the male ego.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Chevalier?

Limited

The cast is mainly composed of white aristocrats, focusing on the internal dynamics of a specific class without diverse racial or ethnic viewpoints.

How does Chevalier represent religion and culture?

Good

The film provides a nuanced critique of Western aristocratic traditions and strict codes of honor. It portrays elite social rituals as absurd and tools for maintaining social dominance.

Does Chevalier include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of visible or invisible disabilities used as central plot drivers or character arcs.

Present on Screen

  • Sophisticated breakdown of traditional masculine hierarchies and the fragile nature of the male ego.
  • Effective use of subtle hints to explore the intersection of rivalry and intimate connections.
  • Sharp critique of Western aristocratic traditions and the absurdity of elite social rituals.

Limited or Absent

  • Significant lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the central cast.
  • Narrow focus on a homogeneous social class that limits layered perspectives.

Official Synopsis

In the middle of the Aegean Sea, six men on a fishing trip on a luxury yacht decide to play a game. During this game, things will be compared. Things will be measured. Songs will be butchered, and blood will be tested. Friends will become rivals and rivals will become hungry. But at the end of the journey, when the game is over, the man who wins will be the best man. And he will wear on his smallest finger the victory ring: the Chevalier.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.