New Showbiz

You are here:
Who You Think I Am

Who You Think I Am

2019

Director

Safy Nebbou

Runtime

102 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Claire, a romantically spurned 50-year-old divorced teacher, creates a fake Facebook profile of a 24-year-old woman to spy on her on-and-off lover.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.0/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film operates within traditional heteronormative structures. There is a notable absence of queer-coded storylines or visible LGBTQ+ identities within the primary character arcs.

Gender Representation

Fair

While female characters avoid submissive tropes, they often serve as catalysts for male psychological evolution. The professional and investigative spheres remain heavily dominated by male perspectives.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The casting of Tahar Rahim provides a significant intersectional boost. The multicultural French setting reflects modern demographic realities and challenges Eurocentric casting norms.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative excels by deconstructing objective truth and Western institutional certainty. It explores moral relativism and the tension between legal authority and individual morality.

Disability Representation

Limited

Psychological distress and mental instability drive the plot, but they lack nuanced portrayal. The focus stays on the investigation's toll rather than the agency of neurodivergent characters.

Strengths

  • Strong intersectional casting through Tahar Rahim's central role.
  • Authentic multicultural depiction of modern French urban environments.
  • Intellectual deconstruction of institutional authority and objective truth.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of visible LGBTQ+ representation or queer-coded narratives.
  • Gendered imbalance in professional and investigative agency.
  • Underdeveloped portrayal of mental health and neurodivergence.

AI Analysis

Safy Nebbou’s drama is a sophisticated exploration of identity and the instability of truth. It succeeds by moving away from homogeneous depictions of authority, utilizing a multicultural setting and intersectional casting to reflect modern French society. However, the film struggles with representation in other key areas. The narrative architecture is largely heteronormative, and the investigative elements are dominated by male perspectives. While psychological themes are central, they function more as plot devices than nuanced depictions of disability. Ultimately, the film is an intellectual exercise in moral ambiguity. It prioritizes the subjectivity of perception over traditional social representation, making it a compelling psychological study that lacks broad demographic inclusivity.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

  • Best Racial & Ethnic Representation in Film
  • Best Religious & Cultural Representation in Film

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Head-On

Head-On

2004

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.6 out of 10
Movie poster for Thug Love

Thug Love

2009

No user ratings available yet
No diversity score available

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.