New Showbiz

You are here:
And Give Us Our Daily Sex

And Give Us Our Daily Sex

1979

Director

José Ramón Larraz

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A pair of sexy bisexual nurses live in an apartment building, one floor up from a middle-aged couple and their son Albert, who is busy putting his new science project—a periscope—to good use by spying on the lingerie-wearing lovelies. Meanwhile, Albert’s mother is being even naughtier than her precious boy, sneaking off for some extra-marital action while her hair-obsessed husband is at the salon, having his follicles tended to. There are multiple versions of this movie - the original softcore version as well as a harder one with inserts of intimate close-ups performed by body-doubles.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.1/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film introduces bisexual nurses, offering a departure from the standard nuclear family models of the late 1970s. However, this representation leans more toward eroticism than deep character development or political agency.

Gender Representation

Good

The narrative subverts traditional archetypes by portraying a mother with significant sexual agency. Meanwhile, the husband's preoccupation with vanity deconstructs traditional masculine authority through a farcical lens.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The film appears to focus on a localized, homogeneous social setting. There is no explicit evidence of a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast within the narrative.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

By framing infidelity and voyeurism as central lived experiences rather than moral failings, the film challenges the sanctity of the traditional Western family unit and religious ethics.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities present in the work.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional gender hierarchies by giving the female lead significant sexual agency.
  • Challenges conventional domestic archetypes through farcical depictions of masculine authority.
  • Employs a framework of moral relativism that deconstructs the traditional nuclear family.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks racial and ethnic diversity, focusing instead on a homogeneous social setting.
  • LGBTQ+ representation is primarily driven by eroticism rather than character depth.
  • Provides no representation or engagement with disability.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a transgressive departure from conservative domesticity, utilizing the tropes of exploitation cinema to explore non-traditional social structures. It succeeds in disrupting gender hierarchies by presenting characters who act outside of traditional matriarchal and patriarchal roles. However, the work is limited by its era and genre. While it explores non-normative sexualities, these elements often serve erotic purposes rather than providing substantive character depth. The lack of racial diversity further restricts the film's intersectional scope. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its moral relativism. It prioritizes subjective experience over the rigid social and religious institutions typical of mainstream 1970s cinema.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Celestine

Celestine

1974

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.1 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.