You are here:

The Great Sioux Massacre

Name: The Great Sioux Massacre
Director: Sidney Salkow
Released: 1965
Duration: 101 min

Representation Score

4.3/10

Fair

1965

Approved

Director

Sidney Salkow

Runtime

101 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film stands out for challenging the traditional Western mythos. Instead of glorifying expansionist triumphs, it portrays the U.S. military's actions as a tragic consequence of systemic issues, offering a post-colonial perspective that was progressive for 1965. However, the film still adheres to the social hierarchies of its time. The absence of LGBTQ+ representation and the relegation of women to supportive roles limit the diversity of its cast. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its portrayal of the Lakota Sioux, moving away from antagonistic 'savage' stereotypes and highlighting their suffering.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Great Sioux Massacre have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The character dynamics stay within the traditional social structures of the late 19th century.

How does The Great Sioux Massacre portray gender?

Limited

Women are confined to domestic or supportive roles, serving as secondary figures. The narrative does not challenge masculine leadership or provide significant opportunities for women to take control of their own stories.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Great Sioux Massacre?

Good

The film offers meaningful representation of the Lakota Sioux, avoiding the typical 'savage' stereotypes. It gives depth and humanity to Indigenous characters by showing their displacement.

How does The Great Sioux Massacre represent religion and culture?

Good

The narrative criticizes colonial violence by depicting the Wounded Knee Massacre and Sitting Bull's death. It highlights the tension between state authority and Indigenous sovereignty.

Does The Great Sioux Massacre include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no intentional focus on disability representation. Characters with disabilities are not central to the story, even though conflict takes a physical toll.

Present on Screen

Humanizes the Lakota Sioux by avoiding the 'savage' stereotype.
Critiques colonial violence and systemic expansionism.
Includes authentic presence through actors like Chief Dan George.

Limited or Absent

Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-traditional narratives.
Maintains traditional gender hierarchies that limit female roles.
Does not focus on characters with disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Colonel Custer, an outspoken believer in fair treatment for the Indians, is ousted from his post and forced into retirement. Fueled by ambition when a Senator Blaine convinces him to run for President, Custer decides to upstage General Terry at Little Big Horn.

How are these scores produced? →