You are here:
Interviewing Monsters and Bigfoot

Interviewing Monsters and Bigfoot

2019

TV-14

Director

Thomas Smugala

Runtime

101 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Cory Mathis, a respected college professor, claims a mythical forest creature killed his wife transforming him into a man haunted by obsession and revenge. He partners up with legendary Big Foot hunter Fran Andersen who is out to collect the Nat Geo 10 million dollar bounty for capture of the creature.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.5/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any visible LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. The central plot focuses on a traditional marital bond.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story features a dual-protagonist structure with a male professor and a female hunter. This pairing suggests a departure from traditional roles by placing the woman in a position of professional expertise.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

There is no information regarding the racial or ethnic identities of the characters. The ensemble's composition remains unverified.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The narrative focuses on individual obsession and capitalist motivators like a bounty. It does not offer a deconstruction of traditional institutions or specific cultural perspectives.

Disability Representation

Minimal

No physical disabilities or neurodivergence are explicitly mentioned. While the protagonist's obsession may imply psychological distress, no disability-centric narrative is confirmed.

Strengths

  • The dual-protagonist structure provides gender balance by featuring both a male and female lead.
  • The female character occupies a position of professional expertise and physical pursuit, challenging traditional gendered roles.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative characters.
  • There is no visible racial or ethnic diversity within the described character ensemble.
  • The narrative does not address disability, neurodivergence, or mental health conditions explicitly.

AI Analysis

The film follows a conventional character-driven comedy structure centered on a professor's obsession and a hunter's pursuit of a bounty. It lacks the visible markers of intersectional representation or the intentional disruption of social hierarchies. While the gender dynamic offers a slight subversion by giving the female lead a role of physical expertise, the broader narrative remains largely unexamined in terms of race, sexuality, or disability. The focus stays strictly on the mythic hunt and personal vengeance.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.