You are here:
First We Take Brooklyn

First We Take Brooklyn

2018

Director

Danny A. Abeckaser

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

An ex-felon joins an Israeli crime syndicate in Brooklyn.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.8/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film maintains a narrow focus on male camaraderie. It does not actively engage with or critique heteronormative structures, resulting in limited visibility for LGBTQ+ characters.

Gender Representation

Limited

The plot is driven almost exclusively by male protagonists. Female characters are relegated to secondary, supportive roles within a traditional masculine-centric framework.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The production excels by utilizing an almost entirely Black cast. It avoids the white gaze by focusing on the specific historical nuances of the Black experience in 1968.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative critiques Western institutions by framing bank robbery as a response to systemic inequality. It challenges the sanctity of capitalist structures and traditional legal authority.

Disability Representation

Limited

There is no significant focus on neurodivergence or physical disabilities. Characters are defined by socioeconomic status and racial identity rather than disability.

Strengths

  • Strong commitment to racial centering through an almost entirely Black cast.
  • Effective use of the crime genre to critique systemic inequality and economic mobility.
  • Avoids the 'white gaze' by prioritizing the lived experiences of marginalized identities.

Areas for Improvement

  • Limited gender diversity with female characters relegated to secondary roles.
  • Lack of visibility or engagement with LGBTQ+ identities and structures.
  • Minimal representation or focus regarding neurodivergence and physical disabilities.

AI Analysis

First We Take Brooklyn uses the heist genre to explore how systemic friction and economic constraints shape the lives of Black men in 1968. The film succeeds in centering racial identity and agency, reframing criminal enterprise as a reactionary response to structural limitations rather than simple greed. However, the film's impact is tempered by a lack of breadth in other identity categories. The narrative is heavily concentrated on male bonding, which limits the presence of female and LGBTQ+ perspectives. Ultimately, the film is a specialized study of racial and cultural interrogation. It trades broad demographic representation for a deep, focused deconstruction of power dynamics and economic exclusion.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.