
The Killing$ of Tony Blair
2016

2015
Director
Nick Berardini
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In the early 2000s, two brothers found tremendous success when their company began selling a device that has been called 'the biggest revolution in law enforcement since the radio.' But as their company grew, they made decisions that would have lasting impact on both the public and their increasingly skeptical customer base.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on a corporate and legalistic narrative regarding law enforcement technology. There is no discernible presence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives exploring non-heteronormative identities.
Gender Representation
The narrative is heavily centered on male figures, specifically the two brothers at the heart of the company. It lacks visible female agency within the primary corporate or investigative arcs.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The documentary explores systemic impacts on the public, which touches upon disparate effects on various communities. However, the focus remains on technical and corporate history rather than explicit intersectional representation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film demonstrates a sophisticated engagement with systemic critique. It adopts a lens of skepticism toward established institutional authority and the unchecked expansion of private-sector influence.
Disability Representation
There is no documented evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The focus remains on the socio-legal implications of the technology.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Killing Them Safely functions as a critique of institutional decision-making and the unintended consequences of privatized security solutions. It prioritizes a systemic analysis of corporate growth versus public safety over character-driven identity narratives. The film's strength lies in its willingness to deconstruct the perceived infallibility of modern law enforcement tools. It challenges the idea of technological progress as an inherent good by highlighting ethical friction. However, the documentary lacks intersectional depth. The narrative is heavily male-centric and focuses on economic and technical history rather than diverse social dynamics or identity-based representation.

2016

2001

2017

2017

1997

2012

2022

2020

2012

2011

2014

2006
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.