You are here:
The Age of Disclosure

The Age of Disclosure

2025

Director

Dan Farah

Runtime

109 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Director Dan Farah got 34 senior members of the U.S. Government, military, and intelligence community to come on camera. He says they reveal an 80 year cover-up of the existence of non-human intelligent life and a secret war amongst major nations to reverse engineer technology of non-human origin. The film explores the profound impact the situation has on the future of humanity, while providing a look behind-the-scenes with those at the forefront of the bi-partisan disclosure effort.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.8/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The documentary focuses on geopolitical intelligence and military testimony. There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

The cast leans toward male-dominated military and political hierarchies. While figures like Kirsten Gillibrand provide inclusion, the narrative centers on traditional power structures.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The film relies on senior U.S. officials, which often reflects a homogeneous demographic. While Marco Rubio provides some institutional representation, the scope remains narrow.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film excels by deconstructing Western institutions. It frames state authority as deceptive, promoting systemic skepticism toward the military-industrial complex and government secrecy.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no mention of experts or characters addressing visible or invisible disabilities within the provided cast or synopsis.

Strengths

  • Strong cultural critique of institutional opacity and government secrecy.
  • Effective use of high-level, bipartisan testimony to challenge official narratives.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of representation for LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisnormative narratives.
  • Limited racial and gender diversity within the primary expert cast.
  • Absence of perspectives addressing disability or neurodiversity.

AI Analysis

The film prioritizes high-level geopolitical testimony over demographic breadth. Its strength lies in its cultural critique of institutional transparency rather than intersectional representation. While the documentary features a bipartisan assembly of officials, the cast remains largely tethered to traditional military and intelligence hierarchies. This results in lower scores for gender and racial diversity. Ultimately, the work functions as a tool for systemic skepticism. It challenges the integrity of Western hegemony by exposing long-standing government cover-ups regarding non-human intelligence.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.