You are here:

War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State

Name: War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State
Director: Robert Greenwald
Released: 2013
Duration: 66 min

Representation Score

3.5/10

Limited

2013

Not Rated

Director

Robert Greenwald

Runtime

66 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The documentary prioritizes a systemic critique of the American national security apparatus over identity-based representation. It succeeds in challenging traditional hierarchies of state power and secrecy, which elevates its cultural score. However, the film's focus on high-level legal and journalistic circles results in a demographic profile that mirrors existing institutional structures, limiting its impact regarding racial and gender diversity. Ultimately, the work is a specialized inquiry into transparency and state authority rather than a study of diverse social identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film focuses on legal and national security frameworks but does not address LGBTQ+ identities or perspectives related to gender and sexuality.

How does War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State portray gender?

Fair

The narrative centers on male-dominated roles within legal and political institutions. However, the inclusion of female journalists provides a balanced professional landscape.

How racially and ethnically diverse is War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State?

Fair

The cast reflects the demographic realities of American legal and journalistic circles, though the subject matter remains centered on Western institutional structures.

How does War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film challenges the perceived infallibility of the state by prioritizing systemic accountability. It frames whistleblowing as essential for democratic transparency and institutional critique.

Does War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no specific depictions of visible or invisible disabilities. These themes do not serve as central narrative drivers in the documentary.

Present on Screen

Challenges traditional Western institutional hierarchies through a lens of systemic accountability.
Provides a balanced professional landscape by including prominent female journalists.
Offers a strong critique of the morality of state-sanctioned secrecy.

Limited or Absent

Lacks engagement with LGBTQ+ identities or perspectives related to gender and sexuality.
Does not actively pursue a non-Anglo-Saxon majority in its cast.
Fails to address disability representation within its narrative framework.

Official Synopsis

War on Whistleblowers: Free Press and the National Security State highlights four cases where whistleblowers noticed government wrong-doing and took to the media to expose the fraud and abuse. It exposes the surprisingly worsening and threatening reality for whistleblowers and the press. The film includes interviews with whistleblowers Michael DeKort, Thomas Drake, Franz Gayl and Thomas Tamm and award-winning journalists like David Carr, Lucy Dalglish, Glenn Greenwald, Seymour Hersh, Michael Isikoff, Bill Keller, Eric Lipton, Jane Mayer, Dana Priest, Tom Vanden Brook and Sharon Weinberger.

How are these scores produced? →