New Showbiz

You are here:
Your Will Be Done

Your Will Be Done

2017

Director

Till Endemann

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

For Johannes and Lydia Klare, their faith in God comes first. Together they lead a small community in Stuttgart, successfully. People listen to them, they are becoming more and more close to them. There are even plans to make the donor-funded community much bigger by the generous contributions of Volker. First of all, the couple have quite different, more urgent points to take care of. When one day they watch the homeless street-boy Simon drifting back and forth in drug-related crises, they take him in for a short while. Together they want to help him again on the right path. But it is not just the drugs that are causing conflicts. Simon's homosexuality also presents the two with great challenge, since it is not so easy to unite with their faith.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.9/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Good

Simon’s homosexuality serves as a central catalyst for conflict within the narrative. The film explores the systemic friction between sexual orientation and rigid, heteronormative religious structures.

Gender Representation

Fair

Johannes and Lydia Klare share a leadership role within their community. While female agency is present, it remains closely tied to the central religious framework.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

There is no explicit mention of racial or ethnic diversity within the primary cast or setting. The focus remains on socio-economic and identity-based friction.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film critiques the rigidity of Western religious institutions. It positions traditional faith as a site of conflict when faced with modern social realities and non-normative identities.

Disability Representation

Good

Simon’s struggle with substance-induced crises offers a nuanced look at addiction. The narrative uses his vulnerability to test the ethical boundaries of the religious community.

Strengths

  • Avoids the 'savior' trope by highlighting the structural failures of the religious community.
  • Provides a nuanced exploration of the friction between sexual orientation and traditional faith.
  • Uses addiction as a complex lens to test the ethical boundaries of religious institutions.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation or mention of racial and ethnic diversity.
  • Female agency remains largely tethered to the established religious and communal hierarchy.

AI Analysis

Till Endemann’s drama succeeds by deconstructing the perceived sanctity of religious leadership. Rather than following a traditional savior trope, the film highlights the structural inability of organized dogma to accommodate individual autonomy and non-normative identities. The tension between the Klare couple’s communal success and Simon’s personal crises provides a sharp critique of how institutions prioritize doctrine over human complexity. This creates a sophisticated study of the friction between institutionalized belief and lived experience. While the film excels in exploring identity-based conflict, it lacks information regarding racial or ethnic diversity. The narrative's strength lies in its refusal to offer easy resolutions to these deep-seated ideological tensions.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Melon Rainbow

Melon Rainbow

2016

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.4 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.