
Harrigan
2013

2015
RDirector
Ricci Harnett
Runtime
111 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
On the 6th December 1995, three Essex gang members were brutally murdered in cold blood. It’s now early 1997 and whoever killed the three men have yet to be brought to justice. An associate of the men, still mourning the loss of his friends, is convinced that it’s only a matter of time before he’s next. For him, the only way out is to go back in and work his way back up the criminal ladder. The higher he gets, the more violent the jobs become, his quest for power turning into an obsession. With life and family on the line can he hold his nerve together one last time in order to get out alive?
Overall Score
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any visible engagement with LGBTQ+ identities. There is no evidence of non-heteronormative gender expressions or same-sex intimacy within the narrative.
Gender Representation
Agency is almost exclusively concentrated in hyper-masculine male characters. Female characters occupy peripheral or domestic roles, serving primarily as emotional stakes for the men.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The casting focuses on a predominantly white British demographic to mirror the Essex gangland setting. It does not utilize diverse ethnic casting to disrupt genre expectations.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story explores gang-enforced retribution over state institutions. However, it functions as a character study of criminal obsession rather than a systemic critique of Western institutions.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible representation of physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities. Characters are defined by the physical capabilities required for high-action crime.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Rise of the Footsoldier: Part II is a traditional crime thriller that prioritizes hyper-masculine storytelling and demographic homogeneity. The narrative adheres strictly to established genre tropes, focusing on underworld hierarchies and personal obsession within a specific British subculture. The film lacks intersectional depth, offering no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or disabilities. It reinforces conventional social structures by centering male agency and maintaining a predominantly white cast to suit its geographic setting. While the film depicts a world operating outside mainstream legal authority, it does not use this to provide a broader systemic or anti-capitalist critique. Instead, it remains a character-driven exploration of survival and loyalty.

2013

2013

1999

2024

2013

2016

1968

2015

2014

2021
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.