You are here:

Bobby Sands: 66 Days

Bobby Sands: 66 Days

Representation Score

4.4/10

Fair

2016

Director

Brendan J. Byrne

Runtime

105 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The documentary focuses on political and religious identities while lacking traditional demographic diversity, especially concerning LGBTQ+ and racial representation. This reflects the specific historical context of the Northern Irish conflict. The film provides a strong post-colonial critique, challenging the legitimacy of Western institutions and the British penal system. It centers the subjective morality and political resistance of the prisoners, emphasizing their struggle against the state.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Bobby Sands: 66 Days have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story focuses solely on political and religious identities relevant to the Northern Irish conflict.

How does Bobby Sands: 66 Days portray gender?

Limited

The narrative is dominated by male characters, with women appearing mainly as peripheral supporters or family members.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Bobby Sands: 66 Days?

Fair

The subjects are predominantly white/Anglo-Celtic, reflecting the specific ethnic makeup of the Northern Irish conflict. The film does not feature actors of diverse backgrounds in non-traditional roles.

How does Bobby Sands: 66 Days represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film effectively portrays the British state as an oppressive force. It highlights the subjective morality of the prisoners and frames their resistance as legitimate political action.

Does Bobby Sands: 66 Days include disability representation?

Fair

The film uses the physical toll of the hunger strike to highlight political conviction. However, it emphasizes martyrdom over exploring chronic illness in depth.

Present on Screen

  • Offers a sophisticated critique of state power and institutional authority.
  • Illustrates political conviction through the physical deterioration of the body.
  • Highlights the subjective morality and political resistance of the prisoners.

Limited or Absent

  • Does not include LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight narratives.
  • Maintains a traditional masculine framework, sidelining women.
  • Reflects the ethnic homogeneity of the specific historical and geographic context.

Official Synopsis

By the early 1980s, after two decades of violence and unrest, the situation in Northern Ireland took a sudden and profound turn inside the infamous Maze Prison. Seeking the right to be treated as political prisoners rather than common criminals, Irish Republicans led by Bobby Sands began a prison hunger strike that would draw international attention to the conflict. In the 66 days that he refused food, Sands would be elected to the British Parliament, put the Irish Republican struggle centre stage on the world news agenda, and pay the ultimate price for his political convictions. The film combines a powerful mosaic of archival materials, reconstructions and the illuminating accounts of former prisoners, commentators and key players in the drama. With Sands's evocative prison diary at its core, the film brings fresh insight to an iconic figure who single-handedly created a transformative moment in Ireland's history that had global aftershocks.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.