You are here:
The Hen That Laid the Golden Eggs

The Hen That Laid the Golden Eggs

1905

Director

Gaston Velle

Runtime

13 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

This has more of a clear narrative than most of the films in the set although it’s still quite odd and random compared to today’s films. There are some effectively surreal and creepy sequences in this imaginative short, such as the devil’s face appearing in an egg and spewing coins as well as the finale where our protagonist is sent to an egg-filled hell.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.5/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any evidence of non-cisnormative gender identities or queer narratives. It functions as a traditional fable without the narrative architecture to address or critique heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Limited

The story focuses on a protagonist driven by greed within a fairy tale framework. It lacks agency-driven female roles or the subversion of masculinity required for a higher score.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The production reflects the homogeneous casting standards of early silent cinema. There is no evidence of a diverse cast or the use of non-human species as metaphors for racial diversity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film utilizes religious iconography, such as a devil's face and a hell sequence. This imagery disrupts conventional morality by framing the protagonist's descent as a surreal consequence of greed.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. Disability is not utilized as a narrative device or plot point within this short.

Strengths

  • Engages with religious and moral iconography through surrealist imagery.
  • Challenges didactic moralism by using a chaotic, egg-filled hell as a consequence for greed.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative narratives.
  • Features a homogeneous cast with no racial or ethnic diversity.
  • Provides no representation of characters with disabilities.
  • Lacks agency-driven female roles or subversions of traditional gender hierarchies.

AI Analysis

Gaston Velle’s work is a foundational piece of cinematic surrealism that prioritizes visual experimentation over social representation. The film relies on early 20th-century archetypal storytelling and folklore rather than intentional subversion of social hierarchies. Because the film predates modern sociological discourse, it lacks the intersectional presence found in contemporary cinema. The narrative is driven by greed and moral consequences rather than diverse character perspectives. Ultimately, the film serves as a technical showcase for trick photography and dream-like imagery. It remains rooted in the homogeneous casting and traditional moral frameworks of the early 1900s.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.