The Immortalists
2014
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Bill Nye: Science Guy
2017
Director
Jason Sussberg, David Alvarado
Runtime
95 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Bill Nye is retiring his kid show act in a bid to become more like his late professor, astronomer Carl Sagan. Sagan dreamed of launching a spacecraft that could revolutionize interplanetary exploration. Bill sets out to accomplish Sagan's mission, but he is pulled away when he is challenged by evolution and climate change contrarians to defend the scientific consensus. Can Bill show the world why science matters in a culture increasingly indifferent to evidence?
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
5.5/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit mention of queer themes or non-heteronormative identities. The narrative focus remains on scientific advocacy rather than exploring LGBTQ+ perspectives.
Gender Representation
The story centers on male figures like Bill Nye and Carl Sagan. However, it portrays leadership through intellectual vulnerability rather than traditional masculine dominance.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
There is no specific evidence regarding the racial composition of the cast. The film focuses on the universal application of science and global climate challenges.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The documentary strongly promotes secularism and scientific reasoning. It critiques traditionalist movements that reject empirical evidence in favor of skepticism.
Disability Representation
There is no information available regarding the depiction of physical disabilities or neurodivergence in this documentary.
Strengths
- Promotes a strong secular worldview and the value of scientific reasoning.
- Critiques traditionalist skepticism and the rejection of empirical evidence.
- Offers a nuanced portrayal of leadership through intellectual rigor.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks visible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.
- Provides no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within the cast.
- Does not address neurodivergence or physical disability representation.
AI Analysis
The documentary functions as a biographical defense of scientific empiricism. It prioritizes the tension between evidence-based truth and cultural skepticism over individual identity narratives. While the film lacks demographic breadth, it achieves a progressive stance by championing secularism. It positions scientific institutions as the essential framework for human progress against anti-science sentiments. Ultimately, the work trades identity-based representation for a systemic focus on shared truth and the defense of the scientific method.
Similar Movies
The Principle
2014
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.3 out of 10
Can We Cool the Planet?
2020
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.5 out of 10
The Revisionaries
2012
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
Carbon: The Unauthorised Biography
2022
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.3 out of 10
Watson
2019
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.7 out of 10
Hubble: Thirty Years of Discovery
2020
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.2 out of 10
Science Fair
2018
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.8 out of 10
Island of Lemurs: Madagascar
2014
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.2 out of 10
The Fantastic Mr Feynman
2013
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.8 out of 10
Aliens of the Deep
2005
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.9 out of 10
Hubble's Cosmic Journey
2015
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.