You are here:
Waiting for the Moon

Waiting for the Moon

1987

Director

Jill Godmilow

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Fictionalized portrait of one of history's great literary couples: Stein & Toklas. Summer 1930s France, Alice tends to ailing Gertrude; they visit Fernande Olivier, Guillaume Apollinaire, others; and Hemingway pops in.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.8/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Excellent

The film centers on the non-heteronormative domestic arrangement between Stein and Toklas. It offers a sophisticated portrait of female intimacy that disrupts traditional romantic tropes.

Gender Representation

Excellent

Female characters possess high agency and intellectual labor. The narrative elevates the female experience, portraying women as the primary drivers of their social and intellectual environment.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast is predominantly composed of white, Western intellectuals. While exploring diverse intellectual perspectives, the film lacks significant racial or ethnic breadth in its central casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The story engages with themes of subjective morality and intellectual secularism. It portrays the expatriate community's departure from rigid, traditional Western moralities.

Disability Representation

Fair

The film touches on physical vulnerability through the depiction of ailing characters. However, these elements serve as character catalysts rather than exploring disability agency.

Strengths

  • Strong emphasis on female agency and intellectual labor.
  • Nuanced depiction of non-heteronormative domesticity and intimacy.
  • Effective subversion of traditional patriarchal social hierarchies.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of racial and ethnic breadth in the central cast.
  • Limited exploration of disability agency beyond character catalysts.

AI Analysis

Waiting for the Moon is a significant piece of feminist filmmaking that successfully disrupts conventional gender hierarchies. By centering the lives of Stein and Toklas, it provides a platform for non-traditional domestic narratives and female intellectual autonomy. The production excels in its portrayal of gender and LGBTQ+ identities, presenting women as central figures in the historical avant-garde. This subverts the patriarchal structures of the early 20th century through a nuanced lens of companionship. However, the film is limited by its specific historical subject matter, which results in a lack of racial diversity. The focus remains almost exclusively on a white, Western intellectual circle in 1930s France.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.