You are here:
Fixies VS Crabots

Fixies VS Crabots

2019

Director

Oleg Uzhinov, Vasiko Bedoshvili, Ivan Pshonkin

Runtime

80 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Professor Eugenius finds both his career and secret friendship with the Fixies in danger when his college sweetheart, Erica, threatens to reveal that Eugenius only beat her out of the University’s Grand Prize in 3D Printing because Fixies were secretly helping him. Erica challenges Eugenius to a rematch to show the world who the better inventor really is! Eugenius will employ his Fixie friends while Erica has little helpers of her own — crabbots, miniature robotic crabs that are faster and stronger than the Fixies.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative expressions. The story centers on a professional rivalry between two inventors without visible queer subtext.

Gender Representation

Fair

Erica serves as a formidable intellectual rival to Eugenius, disrupting traditional gender hierarchies. She possesses significant agency and technical competence through her development of the crabbots.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The narrative focuses on scientific competition and does not specify the ethnic or racial composition of the human cast. There is no evidence of intentional intersectional casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The plot emphasizes secular, technical, and intellectual pursuits rather than religious morality. It operates within a traditional meritocratic framework centered on academic achievement and professional competition.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed in the characters. The cast is defined primarily by their intellectual capacities and technological relationships.

Strengths

  • The female lead, Erica, is a highly competent inventor who challenges male-dominated scientific tropes.
  • The narrative provides meaningful agency to female characters through professional competition and technological innovation.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks visible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender expressions.
  • There is no evidence of intentional racial or ethnic diversity within the human cast.
  • The story lacks complex intersectional layering or systemic critiques of social structures.

AI Analysis

The film operates as a traditional competitive narrative focused on technical problem-solving. Its primary strength lies in its gender dynamics, providing a female character with intellectual parity and agency. However, the work lacks intersectional depth. The absence of diverse racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ identities results in a narrow character landscape. Ultimately, the story adheres to a standard meritocratic framework, prioritizing individual achievement over systemic critique or complex social representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.