You are here:
There Was a Crooked Man...

There Was a Crooked Man...

1970

R

Runtime

123 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Arizona Territorial Prison inmate Paris Pitman, Jr. is a schemer, a charmer, and quite popular among his fellow convicts — especially with $500,000 in stolen loot hidden away and a plan to escape and recover it. New warden Woodward Lopeman has other ideas about Pitman. Each man will have the tables turned on him.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.5/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film adheres to heteronormative standards typical of 1970s Westerns. There is no presence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.

Gender Representation

Limited

The narrative operates within a patriarchal framework. Female characters remain peripheral figures, lacking the agency to drive the central plot.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast is predominantly white and Anglo-Saxon. It reflects the homogeneous social structures of the 1870s frontier archetype.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film subverts Western moralities by embracing moral relativism. It critiques formal legal institutions through a cynical, crooked protagonist.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of visible or invisible disabilities that serve as central character arcs.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional Western moralities by embracing moral relativism.
  • Critiques the efficacy of formal legal institutions and corrupt authority.
  • Offers a sophisticated, character-driven deconstruction of genre archetypes.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks gender parity, relegating women to secondary, peripheral roles.
  • Fails to provide racial or ethnic diversity within the cast.
  • Contains no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative characters.

AI Analysis

Joseph L. Mankiewicz delivers a revisionist Western that prioritizes character complexity over traditional heroism. While the film succeeds in deconstructing genre archetypes through moral ambiguity, it remains tethered to the demographic limitations of its era. The strength of the film lies in its intellectual subversion of the Western mythos. By replacing the righteous lawman with a relativistic framework, it offers a sophisticated critique of authority and justice. However, the film lacks intersectional depth. The reliance on traditional racial, gender, and heteronormative hierarchies prevents it from achieving a more progressive or inclusive perspective.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.