You are here:

Sucker Money

Sucker Money

Representation Score

2.2/10

Limited

1933

NR

Director

Dorothy Davenport, Melville Shyer

Runtime

59 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Sucker Money serves as a cautionary tale reflecting the social structures of the early 20th century. While it features a strong female protagonist, the narrative remains anchored in the social hierarchies of the time. The film emphasizes maintaining social and financial stability over challenging systemic power structures. The production reflects the limitations of its era, focusing on individual criminal behavior rather than addressing complex social issues. It upholds traditional morality and social order through its critique of fraud and spiritualism.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Sucker Money have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film follows the social norms of the early 1930s, where there is no indication of non-binary gender identities or same-sex relationships.

How does Sucker Money portray gender?

Fair

The story centers around a female protagonist who navigates a male-dominated criminal world. She avoids being a passive character but faces vulnerabilities related to financial exploitation.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Sucker Money?

Limited

The film reflects the casting standards of 1930s Hollywood, which are homogeneous and lack diverse characters with significant roles.

How does Sucker Money represent religion and culture?

Limited

The narrative criticizes unconventional beliefs through the depiction of a fraudulent spiritualist. It focuses on protecting traditional economic institutions rather than challenging Western social structures.

Does Sucker Money include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of physical or cognitive disabilities among the characters. None of the characters are used as subjects of mockery or plot devices.

Present on Screen

  • The film positions a female protagonist at the center of the conflict, disrupting typical narratives.
  • It offers a detailed exploration of gendered vulnerabilities within a male-dominated criminal underworld.

Limited or Absent

  • The film perpetuates traditional views of female fragility and social exploitation.
  • The narrative lacks complexity in addressing social issues and fails to challenge systemic power dynamics.
  • The casting reflects the homogeneous and Western-centric standards of the 1930s.

Official Synopsis

A phony spiritualist hypnotizes the daughter of a wealthy banker in a scheme to swindle the banker out of his money. A reporter investigating the swami discovers the plot, determines to expose it.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.