
Don't Try This at Home – The Steve-O Video Vol. 2: The Tour
2002

2004
Director
Steve-O
Runtime
44 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
How did a college drop-out with a drug and alcohol problem use a home video camera to become an international icon of bad behavior? Don't Try This At Home presents Steve-O: The Early Years, a documentary full of footage that censors would never allow on television. Follow Steve-O through his childhood skateboarding and drug-dealing days, first life-threatening stunts, time in the circus and, ultimately, international stardom. You will not believe what a buttnut this guy really is.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on the personal trajectory of a single individual. There is no explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives centered on non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
The narrative is highly centered on the male experience and male-dominated subcultures like skateboarding. It lacks evidence of female agency or the subversion of gender hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
This biographical study appears to center on a homogeneous social circle. There is no evidence of intentional racial blending or diverse casting within the depicted subculture.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film celebrates anti-social behavior and the deconstruction of traditional Western institutions. It prioritizes individualistic rebellion and non-conformist liberation over societal stability.
Disability Representation
The focus on life-threatening stunts aligns more with stunt culture than meaningful disability representation. There is no evidence of characters with disabilities possessing agency beyond physical spectacle.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Steve-O: The Early Years is a niche biographical study of counter-cultural rebellion. It lacks intersectional breadth across gender, race, and LGBTQ+ identities, focusing instead on a singular, hyper-masculine trajectory. However, the film achieves high value through its systemic critique of social norms. By framing drug use and the rejection of formal education as paths to stardom, it challenges traditional meritocracy and conventional morality. Ultimately, the work functions as a celebration of anti-authoritarianism, prioritizing chaotic, non-conformist liberation over the stability of Western institutional success.

2002

2010

2009

2015

1999

2003

2011

2009

2002

2003

2010

2011
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.