You are here:
Safari: Match Me If You Can

Safari: Match Me If You Can

2018

Director

Rudi Gaul

Runtime

104 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Munich, the city of singles and unfulfilled desire. Whoever feels like having a one-night stand can just use Safari, a new dating app. But is it also possible to find love via the app? Harry at least meets Lara through Safari, even though he’s married to Aurelie.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.1/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The story focuses entirely on heteronormative romantic entanglements. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that critique traditional heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Fair

The plot relies on traditional gendered tropes, such as the unfaithful husband and the third party. It inhabits existing social dynamics rather than actively subverting them.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The film appears to adhere to conventional casting norms. There is no indication of diverse ethnic representation or race-bent casting within the character descriptions.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The narrative challenges the stability of the nuclear family by framing infidelity and transient gratification as central plot drivers. It explores moral relativism regarding marriage.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities included in the narrative.

Strengths

  • The film provides a moderate exploration of cultural shifts by questioning the sanctity of traditional Western matrimonial structures.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks engagement with LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisnormative perspectives.
  • There is a complete absence of disability representation within the character arcs.
  • The film relies on conventional gendered tropes rather than subverting social dynamics.
  • The story lacks evidence of racial and ethnic diversity in its casting and characterization.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a social comedy centered on the fragmentation of traditional social contracts in the digital age. While it offers a moderate critique of the permanence of marriage, it remains tethered to conventional romantic conflicts. The narrative lacks engagement with intersectional identities, failing to provide representation for LGBTQ+ communities or individuals with disabilities. It primarily explores the friction between digital dating convenience and established domestic structures. Ultimately, the film prioritizes situational ethics and modern dating tropes over the systemic disruption of social hierarchies or the inclusion of diverse lived experiences.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.