
Cannonball Run II
1984

1981
PGDirector
Hal Needham
Runtime
95 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A cross-country road race is based on an actual event, the Cannonball Baker Sea to Shining Sea Memorial Trophy Dash, organized by Brock Yates to protest the 55 mph speed limit then in effect in the U.S. The Cannonball was named for Erwin G. "Cannonball" Baker, who in the roaring 20's rode his motorcycle across the country. Many of the characters are based on ruses developed by real Cannonball racers over the several years that the event was run.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film operates within a strictly heteronormative framework. There is no presence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
Narrative agency is concentrated almost exclusively in male characters. Women occupy peripheral roles as spectators or romantic foils rather than active drivers of the plot.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast is predominantly white, reflecting the era's mainstream cinematic standards. The film lacks significant racial blending or non-white characters with high agency.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story subverts state authority by framing law enforcement as a comedic obstacle. However, it remains largely secular with no emphasis on religious structures.
Disability Representation
There is no meaningful representation of visible or invisible disabilities. Characters are defined by physical prowess and the ability to operate high-performance machinery.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The Cannonball Run is a high-octane genre piece that prioritizes kinetic action and comedic tropes over social complexity. The narrative architecture reinforces conventional social hierarchies and demographic homogeneity, focusing on a male-dominated ensemble. While the film offers a minor disruption of legal authority by celebrating rule-breaking, it lacks intersectional depth. The characters are largely defined by their ability to master machinery rather than any nuanced social or personal identity. Ultimately, the film functions as a traditional period piece that reflects the mainstream cinematic standards of 1981, offering little engagement with diverse identities or systemic social critiques.

1984

1980

1977

1978

1988

2015

1975

2012

2007

2005

1980

1983
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.