New Showbiz
You are here:

Goofballs

Goofballs

Representation Score

0.8/10

Minimal

1987

PG

Director

Brad Turner

Runtime

87 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Goofballs is a conventional 1987 Canadian comedy that fits the specific genre of its time. It lacks the intentionality needed to disrupt social hierarchies or provide meaningful representation of multiple identities. The film relies on the established clichés of the 'Balls' comedy era, which typically favor homogeneous casting and traditional social structures. This results in a narrative that reinforces standard norms rather than challenging them. Ultimately, the work serves as a typical comedic entry of its time, offering little in the way of progressive narrative structure or diverse character roles.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Goofballs have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any documented LGBTQ+ characters or narratives focusing on non-cisgender identities. There is no indication of LGBTQ+ representation within this comedic framework.

How does Goofballs portray gender?

Limited

The narrative likely upholds traditional gender hierarchies common in late-80s slapstick comedies. Women do not occupy roles of superior intellect or challenge masculine leadership.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Goofballs?

Limited

The production reflects a regional comedic movement that historically favored homogeneous casting. The film does not show actively leading characters of color or diverse ethnic backgrounds.

How does Goofballs represent religion and culture?

Limited

Set in a golf resort, the film highlights leisure and established social structures. It reinforces standard social norms rather than critiquing Western institutions or traditional family units.

Does Goofballs include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no verifiable information regarding the inclusion of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. Neurodivergent representation is also absent from the cast and plot.

Present on Screen

  • The film serves as a clear example of the specific Canadian 'Balls' comedy era of the late 1980s.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks intentionality in disrupting traditional social hierarchies.
  • There is a notable absence of LGBTQ+, racial, and disability representation.
  • The narrative relies on conventional, non-subversive comedic clichés.

Official Synopsis

Another entry in the Canadian "Balls" comedy era, this time set in a golf resort.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.