You are here:
The World According to Monsanto

The World According to Monsanto

2008

Director

Marie-Monique Robin

Runtime

108 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Monsanto is the world leader in genetically modified organisms (GMOs), as well as one of the most controversial corporations in industrial history. This century-old empire has created some of the most toxic products ever sold, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and the herbicide Agent Orange. Based on a painstaking investigation, The World According to Monsanto puts together the pieces of the company’s history, calling on hitherto unpublished documents and numerous first-hand accounts.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.0/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The documentary focuses on corporate agricultural practices and geopolitical influence. There is no presence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives regarding non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

The film does not center on gendered social hierarchies or domestic roles. While it avoids reinforcing traditional patriarchal leadership, it lacks a specific focus on gendered tropes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The narrative prioritizes a global perspective by highlighting agrarian communities in the Global South, such as India. It validates the lived experiences of diverse ethnic populations facing systemic economic pressures.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film critiques global capitalism by exploring the tension between institutional authority and local autonomy. It portrays traditional agricultural methods as a form of resistance against industrial imposition.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The investigative scope focuses on corporate history and agricultural science. There is no discernible focus on disability or neurodivergence within the film.

Strengths

  • Employs a post-colonial lens to highlight the struggles of agrarian communities in the Global South.
  • Challenges Western industrial hegemony by validating the agency of non-Western farmers.
  • Provides a profound critique of how global capitalism disrupts traditional community structures.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks any representation or narrative focus regarding LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Does not engage with gendered social hierarchies or specific gendered perspectives.
  • Provides no discernible coverage of disability or neurodivergence.

AI Analysis

The film excels in its post-colonial framework, moving beyond Western-centric viewpoints to center the agency of non-Western farmers. By examining how patent laws impact sovereignty in the Global South, it provides a necessary critique of systemic power. However, the documentary lacks representation in identity-based social categories. There is no focus on LGBTQ+ narratives or specific gendered social dynamics, which limits its breadth regarding individual identity representation. Ultimately, the film's value lies in its structural critique. It disrupts conventional notions of progress by questioning the ethics of capitalist expansion and the impact of monolithic corporations on local communities.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.