You are here:

Sie sagt. Er sagt.

Name: Sie sagt. Er sagt.
Director: Matti Geschonneck
Released: 2024
Duration: 107 min

Representation Score

8.5/10

Excellent

2024

Director

Matti Geschonneck

Runtime

107 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film functions as a sophisticated courtroom drama that delves into the tension between individual testimony and legal standards. It uses a high-profile criminal trial to examine gendered power dynamics and societal prejudices. The narrative avoids simplistic moral binaries, instead focusing on the instability of truth and the intersection of class, gender, and institutional justice.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Sie sagt. Er sagt. have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The story centers on a heterosexual relationship between a TV presenter and an industrialist. There are no explicit mentions of LGBTQ+ characters or non-straight relationships.

How does Sie sagt. Er sagt. portray gender?

Good

The film highlights a female protagonist challenging a powerful male figure in industry. It deconstructs traditional gender roles by putting the male character under intense legal scrutiny.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Sie sagt. Er sagt.?

Fair

The setting is a Berlin district court, but the film does not provide specific details about the racial makeup of the cast. The focus remains on professional and class distinctions.

How does Sie sagt. Er sagt. represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film explores cultural complexities by examining institutional truths and subjective morality. It looks at how societal values and biases shape perceptions of justice within a legal framework.

Does Sie sagt. Er sagt. include disability representation?

Fair

There is no indication of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The focus remains on the legal and social implications of the central trial.

Present on Screen

Highlights a female protagonist challenging a powerful male figure, disrupting traditional gender hierarchies.
Offers a nuanced exploration of how societal prejudices impact legal truth.
Avoids simplistic moral binaries, focusing instead on complex systemic dynamics.

Limited or Absent

Could include more explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities.
Should provide more information about the racial and ethnic diversity of the cast.
Needs to address the inclusion of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

In a criminal trial at the Berlin district court, in which the accusation of rape is being heard, it is one statement against the other - a seemingly insoluble dilemma, both legally and humanly, that has enormous explosive power. Because beyond the professional and private future of two people, it is about nothing less than the values and prejudices that define us as a society. It is a case of high public attention: the well-known TV presenter Katharina Schlüter and the industrialist Christian Thiede have had a secret affair that has lasted for years, and now they are sitting opposite each other in the courtroom as hostile parties. On the witness stand, Schlüter describes how what was initially consensual sex in Thiede's apartment turned into rape. But are circumstantial evidence sufficient? Experts and witnesses are questioned, and an unexpected turn of events doesn't make it any easier for the court to decide on credibility and truth.

How are these scores produced? →