You are here:

Pigs

Name: Pigs
Director: Karl DiPelino
Released: 2007
Duration: 85 min

Representation Score

1.7/10

Minimal

2007

Director

Karl DiPelino

Runtime

85 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Pigs is a conventional mid-2000s collegiate comedy that prioritizes traditional clichés over progressive themes. The plot is driven by a singular, male-centric objective that reinforces established social hierarchies. The film's structure relies on a gamified approach to romance, which limits the depth of its characterizations. By treating interpersonal connections as a checklist, the narrative avoids exploring multiple aspects of identity. Ultimately, the film adheres to the genre standards of its era, offering a narrow view of social and romantic interactions.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Pigs have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film focuses on heterosexual relationships and conquests, lacking narratives that critique the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender. It also lacks characters with non-cisgender identities.

How does Pigs portray gender?

Limited

Female characters primarily serve as milestones in a gamified social competition, functioning more as transactional objectives rather than having significant roles in driving the story.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Pigs?

Limited

The film's premise relies on an alphabet-based naming convention, which may default to Western-centric naming conventions common in mid-2000s comedies.

How does Pigs represent religion and culture?

Limited

The story emphasizes traditional Western collegiate social dynamics and youthful hedonism, without challenging Western institutions or promoting diverse cultural perspectives.

Does Pigs include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no characters with visible or invisible disabilities in the narrative.

Present on Screen

The film adheres strictly to the established comedic conventions of the mid-2000s collegiate genre.

Limited or Absent

The narrative lacks autonomous female characters, treating women as transactional objectives.
The plot reinforces straight-centered structures without offering diverse identity perspectives.
The surname-based conceit risks defaulting to Western-centric naming conventions.

Official Synopsis

A college ladies man accepts a challenge from his dorm buddies - sleep with the entire alphabet, A through Z, before graduation. The rules are simple: the rarer the first letter of the girl's last name, the higher the payout. All goes well until he falls for the "X". Now he's torn between his feelings for the girl and winning the bet for his friends.

How are these scores produced? →