Poker King
2009
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Poker in Bed
1974
Director
Giuliano Carnimeo
Runtime
85 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A poker player on a losing streak meets a beautiful young woman. He's attracted to her, but she appears to be perfectly content with her boyfriend, a somewhat wussy writer. The gambler gets the idea that if he can get this woman into bed, it will change his luck at the gambling tables.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
2.7/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers on a conventional heterosexual romantic pursuit. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or critiques of heteronormativity within the plot.
Gender Representation
Gender dynamics follow traditional archetypes. The male protagonist drives the action through pursuit, while the female lead serves primarily as an object of desire to influence his luck.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The production reflects the homogeneous demographic norms of 1974 Italian comedy. The narrative adheres to standard Western European casting conventions of the era.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story operates within traditional social mores, focusing on individualistic pursuits like gambling. It lacks any indication of secularist or anti-establishment themes.
Disability Representation
There is no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. No assessment can be made regarding neurodivergence or physical disability.
Strengths
- The film provides a clear, character-driven comedic trajectory typical of the genre.
Areas for Improvement
- The film relies on traditional gender hierarchies and lacks female agency.
- The narrative lacks racial intersectionality and diverse representation.
- The plot follows conventional heteronormative frameworks without subversion.
AI Analysis
Giuliano Carnimeo’s comedy functions as a standard genre piece that prioritizes commercial entertainment over narrative deconstruction. The film relies heavily on established tropes of the era, particularly regarding romantic conquest and gendered archetypes. The narrative lacks intentionality in disrupting social hierarchies. Instead, it follows a predictable trajectory where characters serve specific comedic functions rather than representing diverse lived experiences. Ultimately, the film is a product of its time, adhering to the homogeneous demographic and social norms common to mid-century European cinema.
Similar Movies
Player in Training
2005
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
Horse Fever
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Jinxed!
1982
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Squeak-squeak
1963
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Dance with Me, Henry
1956
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
At the Sports Bar
1983
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
If Luck Favors You
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Popcorn and Ice Cream
1978
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
How to Succeed with Sex
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
The Ladykiller
1969
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Lady Luck
1946
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.