
LX 2048
2020

2013
Director
Dominic Haxton
Runtime
14 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In this alternate history fable set in the 1980s AIDS Crisis, a closeted young man is thrust into the midst of an anti-government coup and finds that the animal within is stronger than the monsters that oppress.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The story centers on a closeted young man navigating the 1980s AIDS crisis. This placement highlights the systemic vulnerabilities and social stigmas faced by the queer community during that era.
Gender Representation
The film subverts traditional masculine archetypes by replacing heroic tropes with a more fluid, instinctual persona. This shift emphasizes raw agency over conventional leadership styles.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
There is no information available regarding the racial composition of the cast or the presence of diverse ethnic narratives.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative critiques Western institutions by framing an anti-government coup as a central conflict. It positions established political structures as antagonistic forces against individual liberation.
Disability Representation
While no specific disabilities are detailed, the focus on the AIDS crisis addresses themes of bodily autonomy and systemic neglect. The protagonist navigates profound biological and social crises.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
We Are Animals is a genre-blending fable that uses an alternate history setting to explore the intersection of queer identity and state oppression. By centering a closeted protagonist during the AIDS crisis, the film moves beyond simple science fiction to engage with real-world social vulnerabilities. The film succeeds in its critique of systemic control, portraying political institutions as oppressive monsters. This perspective prioritizes the agency of the marginalized individual over the stability of the state, offering a sophisticated look at how identity and power collide. However, the film's scope remains narrow in certain areas. While it offers deep thematic engagement with queer identity and institutional critique, it lacks clarity regarding racial diversity and specific disability representation.

2020

2008

2017

2009

1996

2011

2017
1985

1999

2022

2020

2019
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.