
Midsommar
2019

2020
RDirector
Rose Glass
Runtime
85 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Having recently found God, self-effacing young nurse Maud arrives at a plush home to care for Amanda, a hedonistic dancer left frail from a chronic illness. When a chance encounter with a former colleague throws up hints of a dark past, it becomes clear there is more to sweet Maud than meets the eye.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film explores desire through religious asceticism. Maud’s fixation on Amanda suggests a complex, non-heteronormative yearning that avoids traditional labels to challenge standard depictions of female companionship.
Gender Representation
Operating in a female-centric space, the film subverts traditional power hierarchies. The shifting agency between nurse and patient moves away from patriarchal archetypes of strength and stability.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The story maintains a highly localized, homogeneous social environment. The focus on interpersonal psychology results in a lack of racial or ethnic breadth within the primary cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative deconstructs Western religious institutions by framing fervor as a source of isolation. It critiques institutional power by presenting faith as a catalyst for psychological fragmentation.
Disability Representation
The film explores both Amanda’s visible chronic illness and Maud’s invisible psychological struggles. It avoids 'inspiration porn' by treating mental states as complex, lived experiences.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Rose Glass delivers a sophisticated psychological horror that prioritizes female interiority and the deconstruction of religious hegemony. The film excels by subverting the caregiver trope and exploring the blurred boundaries of intimacy through a postmodern lens. While the narrative architecture is progressive in its handling of gender and identity, it remains geographically and socially narrow. The lack of racial and ethnic breadth limits the film's intersectional depth, keeping the scope strictly interpersonal. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its refusal to provide easy moral resolutions. It trades traditional tropes for a nuanced, subjective exploration of vulnerability and belief.

2019

2021

2016

2020

1971

2018

2015

2016

2008

2020

2022

2016
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.