You are here:

What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael

Name: What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael
Director: Rob Garver
Released: 2019
Duration: 98 min

Representation Score

7.9/10

Good

2019

Director

Rob Garver

Runtime

98 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This documentary excels in showcasing the professional ability to act of Pauline Kael, highlighting her disruption of patriarchal intellectual hierarchies. By centering a woman who actively resisted sexism, the film challenges the traditional male dominance in critical expertise. However, the film's narrow focus limits its scope regarding other identities. It does not engage deeply with LGBTQ+ narratives or prioritize racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting the cultural context of the time period. Overall, the work serves as a postmodern exploration of subjective experience. It prioritizes a deep dive into an individual's impact over broad social representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The documentary does not explicitly depict non-binary gender identities or queer stories. It avoids negative stereotypes but does not center on LGBTQ+ narratives.

How does What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael portray gender?

Excellent

The film focuses on a woman who held significant intellectual authority in a male-dominated field. It highlights her active resistance to sexism and her strong role in challenging gender norms.

How racially and ethnically diverse is What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael?

Fair

The film reflects the social constraints of the mid-20th century. It does not emphasize racial or ethnic diversity as a main theme.

How does What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael represent religion and culture?

Good

The documentary celebrates personal perspectives and questions the idea of absolute truth. It prioritizes individual viewpoints over traditional institutions and established authorities.

Does What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael include disability representation?

Fair

The film does not focus on disability, neurodivergence, or physical impairments. It remains neutral, concentrating on intellectual and professional history.

Present on Screen

Highlights a powerful female intellectual challenging gender norms.
Shows a woman as the primary driver of cultural discourse, not just a passive participant.
Celebrates subjective experience over rigid, formal standards.

Limited or Absent

Could include more explicit engagement with LGBTQ+ identities and stories.
Needs to address racial and ethnic diversity more prominently.
Should consider including more focus on disability and neurodivergence.

Official Synopsis

Pauline Kael (1919–2001) was undoubtedly one of the greatest names in film criticism. A Californian native, she wrote her first review in 1953 and joined ‘The New Yorker’ in 1968. Praised for her highly opinionated and feisty writing style and criticised for her subjective and sometimes ruthless reviews, Kael’s writing was refreshingly and intensely rooted in her experience of watching a film as a member of the audience. Loved and hated in equal measure – loved by other critics for whom she was immensely influential, and hated by filmmakers whose films she trashed - Kael destroyed films that have since become classics such as The Sound of Music and raved about others such as Bonnie and Clyde. She was also aware of the perennial difficulties for women working in the movies and in film criticism, and fiercely fought sexism, both in her reviews and in her media appearances.

How are these scores produced? →