New Showbiz

You are here:
What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael

What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael

2019

Director

Rob Garver

Runtime

98 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Pauline Kael (1919–2001) was undoubtedly one of the greatest names in film criticism. A Californian native, she wrote her first review in 1953 and joined ‘The New Yorker’ in 1968. Praised for her highly opinionated and feisty writing style and criticised for her subjective and sometimes ruthless reviews, Kael’s writing was refreshingly and intensely rooted in her experience of watching a film as a member of the audience. Loved and hated in equal measure – loved by other critics for whom she was immensely influential, and hated by filmmakers whose films she trashed - Kael destroyed films that have since become classics such as The Sound of Music and raved about others such as Bonnie and Clyde. She was also aware of the perennial difficulties for women working in the movies and in film criticism, and fiercely fought sexism, both in her reviews and in her media appearances.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.8/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The documentary lacks explicit depictions of non-cisnormative identities or queer-centric storylines. It does not center on LGBTQ+ narratives, though it avoids overt derogatory tropes.

Gender Representation

Excellent

The film centers on a female figure who commanded immense intellectual authority in a male-dominated field. It highlights Kael's agency and her active resistance to sexism.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The film reflects the social constraints of the mid-20th century. It does not focus on racial or ethnic intersectionality as a primary narrative driver.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The documentary celebrates subjective morality and the deconstruction of objective truth. It prioritizes individual perspective over traditional, centralized authority and established institutions.

Disability Representation

Fair

There is no significant focus on disability, neurodivergence, or physical impairment. The film maintains a neutral stance, focusing on intellectual and professional history.

Strengths

  • Strongly subverts traditional gender hierarchies by centering a powerful female intellectual.
  • Effectively portrays a woman as a primary driver of cultural discourse rather than a passive observer.
  • Aligns with progressive values by celebrating subjective experience over rigid, formalist standards.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit engagement with LGBTQ+ identities or queer-centric storytelling.
  • Does not address racial or ethnic intersectionality as a primary narrative element.
  • Provides no significant focus on disability or neurodivergence within its biographical scope.

AI Analysis

This documentary succeeds as a study of professional agency, specifically through its portrayal of Pauline Kael's disruption of patriarchal intellectual hierarchies. By centering a woman who fiercely fought sexism, the film challenges the traditional masculine monopoly on critical expertise. However, the film's narrow biographical focus limits its scope regarding other identities. It lacks engagement with LGBTQ+ narratives and does not prioritize racial or ethnic intersectionality, reflecting the specific cultural milieu of the era it examines. Ultimately, the work functions as a postmodernist exploration of subjectivity. It trades broad social representation for a deep dive into how an individual can dismantle established institutional authority through personal, experiential discourse.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.