You are here:

$1,000 a Minute

Name: $1,000 a Minute
Director: Aubrey Scotto
Released: 1935
Duration: 70 min

Representation Score

3.0/10

Limited

1935

Director

Aubrey Scotto

Runtime

70 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This 1935 comedy functions as a high-concept farce centered on the rapid depletion of capital. While it highlights the friction between extreme wealth and a penniless protagonist, it remains rooted in the era's traditional social hierarchies. The film utilizes standard gendered clichés and a homogeneous cast, offering little in the way of diverse representation. The central experiment serves as a plot device for kinetic comedy rather than a tool for social deconstruction. Ultimately, the narrative preserves the status quo. It treats the absurdity of wealth as a vehicle for escapist entertainment rather than a means to challenge systemic power or provide diverse representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does $1,000 a Minute have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not depict any non-straight relationships or include queer subtext. It focuses on traditional romantic dynamics between the male and female leads.

How does $1,000 a Minute portray gender?

Limited

Leila Hyams plays a central role, but the narrative is driven by the male protagonist and wealthy men. Female characters primarily serve as romantic foils.

How racially and ethnically diverse is $1,000 a Minute?

Minimal

The film features a homogeneous cast typical of 1930s comedies. There is no evidence of characters of color with significant roles or intentional racial blending.

How does $1,000 a Minute represent religion and culture?

Fair

The story critiques extreme capitalism through a comedic lens. It frames the tension between the elite and the penniless protagonist without offering a systemic critique.

Does $1,000 a Minute include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with disabilities being portrayed with significant roles. The focus remains on the physical comedy of a race against time.

Present on Screen

The narrative introduces a compelling tension between the extreme wealth of millionaires and the struggles of the working class.

Limited or Absent

The film relies on traditional patriarchal structures and lacks significant roles for female characters.
The cast is homogeneous, lacking racial diversity or characters of color with significant roles.
There is a complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-straight relationships.

Official Synopsis

Two rich and wealthy millionaires who have a lot of money bet that reporter Wally Jones can't spend $720,000 in twelve hours.

How are these scores produced? →