You are here:
Goosebumps: The Scarecrow Walks at Midnight

Goosebumps: The Scarecrow Walks at Midnight

1996

Not Rated

Director

Randy Bradshaw

Runtime

66 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

There something funny about Jodie and Mark's grandparents' farm, but nobody's laughing, especially when twelve strange new scarecrows scare more than just the crows! Don't Go To Sleep: Matt Amsterdam wishes his family were different - until he wakes up from a nap in the attic to find that things are suddenly very different. Calling All Creeps: Ricky Beamer hopes for revenge when he puts a mean girl's phone number in a personal ad. But when he starts getting scary midnight calls, he's the one getting the creeps!

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.4/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film focuses on traditional adolescent horror tropes and supernatural suspense. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative gender identities or narratives that critique heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Limited

Characters occupy conventional roles within the suspense genre. While a 'mean girl' appears, she functions within standard social hierarchies rather than subverting gendered power dynamics.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The setting reflects mid-90s demographic norms, presenting a homogeneous social backdrop. There is no evidence of intentional color-blind casting or diverse racial blending.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

Themes are rooted in traditional suspense and the preservation of the status quo. The narrative does not engage with systemic critiques of Western institutions or religion.

Disability Representation

Limited

The plot focuses strictly on supernatural elements and psychological tension. There is no indication of characters with visible or invisible disabilities being integrated with agency.

Strengths

  • The film successfully utilizes established 1990s youth-oriented supernatural horror tropes to drive suspense.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks intentionality regarding intersectional representation or the disruption of traditional social hierarchies.
  • The production maintains a homogeneous social backdrop that lacks racial and cultural breadth.
  • Character roles follow standard genre archetypes rather than providing agency to underrepresented groups.

AI Analysis

This production functions as a conventional genre piece, adhering to the social and narrative hierarchies typical of the 1990s direct-to-video market. It prioritizes established suspense-horror mechanics over diverse storytelling. The film lacks the intentionality required to disrupt established tropes or provide intersectional representation. Most characters exist within standard archetypes that reinforce the status quo rather than challenging it. Ultimately, the narrative remains centered on individualistic teen experiences and external supernatural threats, offering little in the way of social or cultural breadth.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.