
Given
2017

2010
Director
Pedro Diógenes, Ricardo Pretti, Luiz Pretti, Guto Parente
Runtime
70 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
“Always keep Ythaca on your mind. To arrive there is your ultimate goal. But do not hurry the voyage at all. It is better to let it last for many years; and to anchor at the island when you are old, rich with all you have gained on the way, not expecting that Ythaca will offer you riches. Ythaca has given you the beautiful voyage. Without her you would have never set out on the road. She has nothing more to give you. And if you find her poor, Ythaca has not deceived you. Wise as you have become, with so much experience, you must already have understood what Ythaca mean.” Konstantínos Kaváfis
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on an internal, subjective journey that moves away from heteronormative structures. However, there is no explicit evidence of queer identities or non-cisnormative depictions.
Gender Representation
The documentary uses a philosophical framework to de-emphasize traditional gender hierarchies. It prioritizes universal human experience over specific masculine or feminine archetypes.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
A diverse group of directors suggests a non-homogenous creative perspective. The work engages with Greek poetic traditions, indicating a cross-cultural intellectual approach.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film aligns with progressive values by prioritizing subjective morality over material wealth. It critiques capitalist notions of success by framing the journey as the ultimate reward.
Disability Representation
There is no specific evidence regarding the inclusion of individuals with visible or invisible disabilities within the documentary.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Road to Ythaca operates as a philosophical meditation rather than a character-driven narrative. Because it centers on existential inquiry and the poetry of Constantine Cavafy, it lacks the traditional cast structures used to measure demographic representation. The film's strength lies in its intellectual architecture, which challenges Western teleological progress and capitalist definitions of achievement. It replaces material goals with a focus on wisdom and the experiential process. However, the documentary's abstract nature means it lacks explicit demographic markers. While it avoids reinforcing conventional social hierarchies, it does not provide clear evidence of specific intersectional or identity-based representation.

2017

2011

2014

2009

2020

2003

2015

2003

1996

1972

2017

2010
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.