The Graduation Exercises
1935
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.9 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
No Poster Available
Getting Ahead
1965
ApprovedDirector
Howard Post
Runtime
6 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The film consists of many maxims appearing on the screen and after each there is an almost completely irrelevant clip to supposedly illustrate the point.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
1.9/10
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film's structure of brief, disconnected clips prevents the development of queer identity arcs. There is no evidence of non-heteronormative themes or critiques of heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
The narrative likely relies on traditional comedic archetypes common to the 1960s. A lack of character development suggests a reliance on conventional gender roles.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The work appears to follow the homogeneous casting standards typical of mid-century animation. There is no evidence of diverse casting or non-white protagonists.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film's reliance on maxims suggests a framework rooted in established Western social norms. It lacks explicit systemic or secular critiques.
Disability Representation
There is no indication of characters with disabilities acting as agents of the plot. The format lacks depth for meaningful representation.
Strengths
- The film utilizes a unique, non-linear structure that prioritizes abstract comedic timing through disconnected vignettes.
Areas for Improvement
- The clip-based format lacks the character agency necessary to explore diverse identities or complex social themes.
- The narrative relies on traditional archetypes and established Western social norms rather than subverting them.
AI Analysis
Getting Ahead is a short-form animated comedy that prioritizes abstract comedic timing over character-driven storytelling. Because the film functions as a series of disconnected vignettes meant to illustrate maxims, it lacks the narrative depth required to explore complex identities. The production reflects the standard industry practices of 1965, adhering to the era's homogeneous casting and traditional social frameworks. The structural choice to decouple visual content from textual prompts results in a work that reinforces established norms rather than challenging them. Ultimately, the film's aphoristic nature precludes the exploration of intersectional identities or the subversion of social hierarchies.
Similar Movies
Hound Hunters
1947
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Scrambled Aches
1957
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Ballyhooey
1960
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
The Talking Magpies
1946
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.3 out of 10
Hip Hip Ole
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Highway Slobbery
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.3 out of 10
Crow's Fete
1965
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Talking Horse Sense
1959
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
Whoa, Be-Gone!
1958
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.3 out of 10
Out-Foxed
1949
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
Small Fry
1939
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.