You are here:
Chilling Visions: 5 Senses of Fear

Chilling Visions: 5 Senses of Fear

2013

Not Rated

Director

Nick Everhart, Miko Hughes, Eric England, Jesse Holland, Andy Mitton, Emily Hagins

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A horror anthology of shorts themed around the five senses.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.1/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks documented LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities. There is no evidence of queer representation within the anthology segments.

Gender Representation

Fair

Gender diversity is most visible in the directorial tier, featuring Emily Hagins. This inclusion provides a meaningful departure from the male-dominated leadership typical of horror.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The production lacks evidence of high-agency characters of color or intersectional casting. While the cast includes diverse names, no specific racial narratives are documented.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Minimal

The anthology focuses on biological and psychological fear rather than socio-political critique. It does not appear to deconstruct Western institutions or religious norms.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence regarding the portrayal of physical disabilities or neurodivergence. Mental health conditions do not appear to serve as central narrative drivers.

Strengths

  • The directorial cohort shows meaningful gender inclusion through the presence of female filmmakers.
  • The multi-director structure allows for a variety of creative perspectives across the anthology segments.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks verifiable representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative characters.
  • There is a lack of diverse racial casting and high-agency characters of color.
  • The narrative does not address disability, neurodivergence, or mental health themes.

AI Analysis

Chilling Visions: 5 Senses of Fear functions as a sensory-driven horror anthology that relies on a multi-director structure. This fragmented approach distributes creative agency across several filmmakers, which is the film's primary source of diversity. The production's strength lies in its leadership, specifically the inclusion of female directors in a genre often dominated by men. However, the film lacks depth in other areas of representation. There is a notable absence of LGBTQ+ identities, racial intersectionality, and disability representation. The film remains focused on visceral horror tropes rather than identity-driven or socio-political storytelling.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.