You are here:
Close

Close

2019

R

Director

Vicky Jewson

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A counter-terrorism expert takes a job protecting a young heiress. After an attempted kidnapping puts both of their lives in danger, they must flee.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.5/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Good

The film explores the liminal space between deep platonic intimacy and burgeoning romantic identity. It utilizes a lens of fluidity that challenges heteronormative frameworks of adolescent friendship.

Gender Representation

Excellent

The narrative subverts traditional hierarchies by centering almost exclusively on female perspectives and agency. Characters are defined by emotional autonomy rather than their relationships to male figures.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The film features a predominantly white cast within a contemporary London setting. It does not utilize diverse ethnic ensembles to drive its central themes.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The story deconstructs social norms and the performative expectations of high-achieving environments. It prioritizes emotional authenticity over the rigid standards imposed by parental and academic institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no significant evidence regarding the portrayal of visible or invisible disabilities.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional gender hierarchies by centering female agency and autonomy.
  • Explores the complex fluidity of adolescent identity and emotional bonding.
  • Critiques rigid social structures and performative expectations of high-achieving environments.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks racial and ethnic diversity, featuring a predominantly white cast.
  • Does not provide representation for visible or invisible disabilities.

AI Analysis

Close is a sophisticated study of identity that excels in disrupting gendered narrative tropes. By prioritizing the emotional and intellectual lives of young women, the film moves away from male-centric structures and avoids using female characters as secondary motivators. The film's strength lies in its exploration of the fluidity of adolescent identity. It challenges conventional expectations of teenage social dynamics through a nuanced lens of non-traditional emotional bonding. However, the film lacks racial breadth, presenting a more homogeneous demographic. While the thematic depth is high, the lack of ethnic diversity limits the scope of its social commentary.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.