You are here:

Wagtail's Army Fighting Again

Name: Wagtail's Army Fighting Again
Director: Aleksandrs Leimanis
Released: 1968
Duration: 85 min

Representation Score

7.6/10

Good

1968

Director

Aleksandrs Leimanis

Runtime

85 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Wagtail's Army Fighting Again is a product of its time, focusing on systemic disruption and the empowerment of a youth-led collective. It excels in critiquing established class-based institutions and traditional power structures, positioning the next generation against historical hierarchies. However, the film lacks modern markers of diversity. It offers little visibility for LGBTQ+ identities or characters with disabilities, adhering to the period's emphasis on collective identity over individual identity. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its cultural critique of authority, even as it remains limited by the social norms of 1968 Soviet filmmaking.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Wagtail's Army Fighting Again have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not prominently feature individuals with non-conforming gender identities or sexual orientations. The narrative focuses on collective identity rather than individual sexual orientation.

How does Wagtail's Army Fighting Again portray gender?

Fair

Young characters share responsibilities and influence the story's direction. However, there is no clear indication of challenging traditional male authority.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Wagtail's Army Fighting Again?

Good

The film highlights class struggles rather than ethnic differences. A diverse cast helps challenge the dominance of the aristocracy.

How does Wagtail's Army Fighting Again represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The story critiques traditional hierarchies and capitalism by presenting anti-Bolshevik forces as antagonists. It emphasizes communal identity over the traditional nuclear family structure.

Does Wagtail's Army Fighting Again include disability representation?

Fair

There is no evidence of neurodivergent or physically disabled characters with significant roles. Characters with disabilities are often portrayed as vulnerable.

Present on Screen

Strong critique of traditional class-based authority and Western-aligned power structures.
Emphasis on communal identity and the empowerment of a youth-led collective.
Fluid ability to act among young protagonists within an action-adventure framework.

Limited or Absent

Lack of visible representation for LGBTQ+ identities or non-conforming gender characters.
Absence of characters with disabilities portrayed with meaningful roles.
Limited focus on individual identity outside of the broader political struggle.

Official Synopsis

Disguised as a wealthy businessman, Red Army intelligence agent Platais arrives in a city held by the White forces with his companion Miks. Their mission is to reach a railway station and, with the help of partisans, sabotage the tracks. As Platais gathers vital information by befriending Lieutenant Colonel Sviridov, Cielaviņa and Čigāns build an unexpected alliance with a group of homeless people. Through courage, ingenuity and the help of his unlikely allies, Platais sets out to disarm the White officers and complete his dangerous mission.

How are these scores produced? →