New Showbiz

You are here:
The Sound of Summer

The Sound of Summer

2022

Director

Guy

Runtime

70 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In the relentless heat of the gruelling summer, temperatures soar to blistering levels as cicadas emerge to sing their ear-shattering song. Months of continued exposure is enough to make anyone start to feel a little off. Anyone, that is, except that oddity the locals call ‘the Cicada Man’. Who is that strange man and why is he always walking around with boxes full of live cicadas? More important, what does he do with them? As the heat starts to get to our heroine, and her sanity depletes, real life and delusion begin to mix. Her darkest nightmares seep into our world and she fears the Cicada Man has planted his swarm of insects inside her. She must get them out – at all costs. Thus begins her downward spiral into extreme paranoia and self-mutilation. She just needs to make it through the summer.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film contains no mention of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. The narrative focus remains strictly on the protagonist's internal psychological state.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on a female protagonist facing a profound psychological crisis. She is granted significant agency in her struggle for survival and her confrontation with delusions.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

There is insufficient information regarding the racial or ethnic composition of the cast. No specific racial identities or ethnic conflicts are identified in the narrative.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film explores themes of subjective reality and the blurring of lines between truth and delusion. It lacks explicit commentary on specific social or Western institutions.

Disability Representation

Good

The narrative engages with mental health through the protagonist's extreme paranoia and depleting sanity. It explores the internal experience of mental instability rather than using traditional tropes.

Strengths

  • The film provides a nuanced exploration of mental health and neurodivergence through its protagonist's psychological breakdown.
  • The female lead is granted significant agency as she navigates her descent into paranoia and survival.
  • The narrative challenges traditional horror tropes by focusing on internal, subjective experiences of reality.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities and non-heteronormative themes.
  • There is a notable absence of racial and ethnic diversity within the available narrative details.
  • The narrow focus limits the film's ability to provide a broad social or intersectional critique.

AI Analysis

The film functions primarily as a character study of psychological disintegration. It prioritizes the subjective experience of a single protagonist, which disrupts conventional horror tropes that rely on external threats. While the work shows potential in its exploration of mental health and subjective reality, the narrative focus is narrow. It lacks broad intersectional representation across racial, gender, and LGBTQ+ spectrums. The film's strength lies in its ability to challenge the stability of the 'sane' observer, though it remains a localized psychological study rather than a broad social critique.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.