New Showbiz
You are here:

Bipedalism

Bipedalism

Representation Score

6.4/10

Good

2005

Director

Evgeny Yufit

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Bipedalism functions more as a cinematic essay than a conventional narrative, limiting its engagement with traditional demographic representation. The film lacks romantic pairings or social hierarchies, making it challenging to evaluate through standard identity-based frameworks. However, the work excels in intellectually deconstructing the human form through a lens of paleoanthropology and psychoanalysis. By moving away from mainstream clichés, it explores the fluidity of the human condition. While the film does not explicitly represent LGBTQ+ or diverse gendered identities, it centers the concept of biological and mental anomalies, elevating non-normative states to a central thematic position.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Bipedalism have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film focuses on scientific theories and ontological concepts rather than interpersonal relationships. There are no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives about gender identity.

How does Bipedalism portray gender?

Fair

The story centers on a male scientist dealing with physical and mental anomalies. It lacks diverse gender perspectives and challenges to traditional masculine roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Bipedalism?

Fair

Archival materials from the Museum of Anthropology provide a global perspective on human origins. However, race is not a central narrative element or a tool for character's ability to drive the story.

How does Bipedalism represent religion and culture?

Good

The film challenges Western scientific progress by framing evolution through psychoanalysis and anomalies. This approach prioritizes theoretical complexity over traditional moralities.

Does Bipedalism include disability representation?

Good

The central theme explores an epidemic of physical and mental anomalies, granting a significant role in driving the story to non-normative bodies and treating deviation as foundational.

Present on Screen

  • The film provides a profound exploration of neurodivergence and physical deviation by focusing on biological anomalies.
  • It uses anthropological archives to offer a global, academic perspective on human origins and evolution.
  • The work successfully challenges the stability of Western scientific progress through a postmodern, theoretical lens.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ representation or narratives about gender identity.
  • There is a notable absence of diverse gender perspectives and challenges to traditional masculine roles.
  • Race is treated as an incidental subject of anthropology rather than a driver of character's ability to drive the story.

Official Synopsis

The main character is crazy about about depicting various anomalies in art. Accidentally he finds a cinematography archive which makes him advance a completely new theory on the reasons why humans became bipedal. Yufit proceeds with the plot by describing a scientist struggling against the epidemic wave of anomalies in the physical and mental world thematically started in his other films. This time the struggle takes place on the background of paleoanthropology, psychoanalysis and modern art. As materials of the Museum of Anthropology and other archives are included in the film, it oversteps the boundary between a feature film and documentary.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.