You are here:
Fantastic Journey to Oz

Fantastic Journey to Oz

2017

G

Director

Vladimir Toropchin, Fedor Dmitriev, Darina Shmidt

Runtime

82 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The cunning and wicked Urfin wants to become ruler of Magic Land. With an army of wooden soldiers, he captures the Emerald City and renames it ti Urfinville. He is all but ready to celebrate victory, when his plans are ruined by an ordinary girl named Dorothy, who arrives in Magic Land just at the right time. She must return home, but not before she helps her friends - the Scarecrow, the Tin Man, and new-brave Lion - defeat Urfin. And in order to do that, they need to find out who he really is.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.7/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The narrative follows a traditional quest structure focused on a core group of companions. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy within the character arcs.

Gender Representation

Fair

Dorothy serves as the primary agent of change, disrupting traditional hierarchies. Her actions facilitate the liberation of the Emerald City, subverting the typical damsel in distress trope.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The film uses non-human species as proxies for identity within a fantasy setting. While diverse fantastical entities exist, there is no specific evidence of intersectional or non-Anglo-centric casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The story follows a standard good versus evil framework centered on resisting autocracy. It leans into traditional morality tales rather than offering complex institutional or secularist critiques.

Disability Representation

Fair

The Scarecrow and Tin Man act as metaphors for cognitive and physical differences. While they possess high agency, they function more as metaphors than nuanced depictions of lived experience.

Strengths

  • Positions a female protagonist as the central catalyst for social and political change.
  • Subverts the 'damsel in distress' trope by giving Dorothy significant agency.
  • Utilizes diverse fantastical entities to provide a degree of non-human variety.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks nuanced depictions of lived disability experience beyond functional metaphors.
  • Follows conventional heteronormative frameworks without exploring diverse identities.
  • Relies on standard morality tales rather than complex cultural or systemic critiques.

AI Analysis

This animated adaptation of the Oz mythos relies heavily on archetypal structures to drive its family-oriented adventure. While it succeeds in placing a female protagonist at the center of the political upheaval, the narrative remains within the bounds of conventional storytelling. The film's diversity is primarily expressed through fantastical proxies rather than human intersectionality. The use of non-human characters provides a moderate layer of variety, but the lack of complex social critiques limits its progressive depth. Ultimately, the film is a traditional hero's journey. It offers moderate subversion through its lead character but lacks the systemic layers required for a more diverse or inclusive representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.