You are here:
Concrete Plans

Concrete Plans

2020

Director

Will Jewell

Runtime

91 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

When their employer tries to cheat them out of a job, a rugged crew of workmen turn first on him then each other, leading to a bloody confrontation.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.7/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities. The focus remains strictly on class-based conflict.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on a rugged crew of workmen, a trope that reinforces traditional masculine hierarchies. The primary drivers appear to be male-centric archetypes of aggression.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The inclusion of Amber Rose Revah suggests some racial diversity within the ensemble. However, the narrative prioritizes socioeconomic stratification over explicit racial intersectionality.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film challenges capitalist authority by depicting a deceptive employer and a breakdown of professional hierarchy. It focuses on the friction within established economic structures.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the narrative.

Strengths

  • The film provides a critique of capitalist authority and professional hierarchies.
  • The cast includes diverse actors like Amber Rose Revah, suggesting some racial representation.
  • The narrative explores meaningful themes of class differences and socioeconomic stratification.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film relies on traditional masculine archetypes and male-centric aggression.
  • There is a lack of documented representation for LGBTQ+ identities.
  • The story lacks visible or invisible disability representation.

AI Analysis

Concrete Plans is a genre-driven thriller that prioritizes socioeconomic conflict over a multifaceted exploration of identity. The narrative architecture is built around class warfare and the breakdown of workplace stability, which provides a critique of economic hierarchies but lacks broader intersectional depth. While the film offers some representation through its cast and its subversion of institutional authority, it relies heavily on traditional masculine tropes. The focus on a rugged crew of workmen suggests a narrow lens that may overlook diverse gender and identity perspectives. Ultimately, the film functions as a localized study of rich versus poor. It succeeds in disrupting notions of capitalist stability but fails to provide documented breadth across gender, disability, or queer identities.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.