You are here:

Persona: The Dark Truth Behind Personality Tests

Name: Persona: The Dark Truth Behind Personality Tests
Director: Tim Travers Hawkins
Released: 2021
Duration: 85 min

Representation Score

4.6/10

Fair

2021

TV-MA

Director

Tim Travers Hawkins

Runtime

85 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Persona functions primarily as an institutional critique rather than a vehicle for demographic representation. Its value lies in its skepticism toward Western psychological metrics and the power dynamics of personality labeling. The film prioritizes deconstructing systemic categorization over exploring diverse identities. While the documentary challenges how standardized tools enforce social hierarchies, it lacks specific identity-based storytelling. It remains an academic and investigative look at psychological frameworks.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Persona: The Dark Truth Behind Personality Tests have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The documentary focuses on psychological testing methodologies without addressing sexual orientation or LGBTQ+ narratives. It does not explore the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does Persona: The Dark Truth Behind Personality Tests portray gender?

Fair

The film explores how personality tests can reinforce gendered expectations within corporate hierarchies. However, it does not provide character-driven subversion of gender roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Persona: The Dark Truth Behind Personality Tests?

Fair

The narrative examines the universality and potential biases of psychological testing. It does not focus on racialized ability to act or non-Anglo-Saxon perspectives.

How does Persona: The Dark Truth Behind Personality Tests represent religion and culture?

Good

The film questions established Western institutional frameworks and disrupts conventional trust in traditional academic and corporate structures. It aligns with progressive values.

Does Persona: The Dark Truth Behind Personality Tests include disability representation?

Fair

The critique of categorization suggests an implicit concern for how standardized tests may sideline non-conforming cognitive profiles. However, specific neurodivergent ability to act is not clearly documented.

Present on Screen

Challenges the validity of Western psychological metrics and institutional logic.
Provides a progressive critique of how standardized tools enforce social hierarchies.
Disrupts conventional trust in traditional academic and corporate structures.

Limited or Absent

Lacks multi-layered character depth and specific demographic representation.
Does not explicitly center racialized ability to act or non-Anglo-Saxon perspectives.
Provides limited evidence of neurodivergent subjects driving the narrative with ability to act.

Official Synopsis

A documentary exploring the history and growing dangers surrounding the seemingly innocuous Myers–Briggs personality test.

How are these scores produced? →