You are here:

The Cost of Living

Name: The Cost of Living
Director: Philippe Le Guay
Released: 2003
Duration: 98 min

Representation Score

2.4/10

Limited

2003

Director

Philippe Le Guay

Runtime

98 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Philippe Le Guay’s ensemble comedy prioritizes character-driven domestic realism over progressive storytelling. The film operates within established social norms, focusing on the emotional nuances of middle-class life rather than challenging systemic power dynamics. The production offers a localized, homogeneous view of contemporary French life. It lacks engagement with multiple aspects of identity, providing little representation for LGBTQ+ identities, racial diversity, or disability. Ultimately, the film functions as a traditional study of human idiosyncrasies. It adheres to conventional storytelling structures that reinforce Eurocentric social norms rather than subverting them.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Cost of Living have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film focuses on straight relationships and traditional romantic entanglements. There is no evidence of queer narratives or non-straight identities within the character descriptions.

How does The Cost of Living portray gender?

Fair

The story explores marriage and middle-class interpersonal dynamics. While it touches on domestic complexities, it does not aggressively challenge traditional gender roles or social expectations.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Cost of Living?

Limited

The ensemble cast reflects a predominantly white, homogeneous French middle-class demographic. The film lacks significant minority representation or casting actors from diverse backgrounds.

How does The Cost of Living represent religion and culture?

Fair

The narrative examines the psychological impact of wealth and consumerism. It avoids explicit anti-capitalist stances or the deconstruction of Western family structures.

Does The Cost of Living include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The focus remains strictly on socioeconomic and romantic struggles.

Present on Screen

Provides a realistic study of middle-class interpersonal relationships and domestic life.
Offers a character-driven exploration of how wealth and scarcity impact human emotion.

Limited or Absent

Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities and non-straight gender expressions.
Fails to include racial or ethnic diversity beyond a homogeneous white demographic.
Provides no visible or invisible disability representation within the ensemble cast.

Official Synopsis

Une héritière qui n'arrive pas à hériter, un radin qui ne peut rien dépenser, un petit garçon qui trouve un billet dans la rue, un restaurateur prodigue qui ne fait que donner... Tels sont, entre autres, les personnages de ce film "choral". Pourquoi certains dépensent-ils de manière convulsive là où d'autres retiennent l'argent comme la partie la plus vitale de leur être ? On croit parler d'argent, mais c'est d'amour dont il s'agit.

How are these scores produced? →