New Showbiz

You are here:
Attenborough and the Giant Elephant

Attenborough and the Giant Elephant

2017

Director

Stephen Dunleavy

Runtime

58 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

David Attenborough investigates the remarkable life and death of Jumbo the elephant - a celebrity animal superstar whose story is said to have inspired the movie Dumbo. Attenborough joins a team of scientists and conservationists to unravel the complex and mysterious story of this large African elephant - an elephant many believed to be the biggest in the world. With unique access to Jumbo's skeleton at the American Museum of Natural History, the team work together to separate myth from reality. How big was Jumbo really? How was he treated in captivity? And how did he die? Jumbo's bones may offer vital clues.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.3/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The documentary focuses on zoological investigation and historical inquiry. There are no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives exploring non-heteronormative identities present in the film.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative centers on scientific collaboration between conservationists and researchers. While the subject matter is gender-neutral, the film does not explicitly address or subvert traditional gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The investigation into an African elephant's life in Western institutions suggests a potential critique of colonial-era specimen collection. This framework may touch upon historical power dynamics between the Global South and the West.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film prioritizes empirical investigation and forensic science over traditionalist frameworks. By separating myth from reality, it aligns with a post-traditionalist worldview centered on evidence-based truth.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The documentary focuses on skeletal analysis and zoological study. There is no indication of human characters with visible or invisible disabilities serving as central narrative figures.

Strengths

  • Challenges historical narratives regarding the treatment of non-human subjects and the ethics of Western scientific institutions.
  • Uses forensic science to disrupt celebrity myths and reveal complex systemic realities of captivity.
  • Provides a framework for critiquing colonial-era specimen collection and the movement of wildlife.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative narratives.
  • Does not feature human characters with visible or invisible disabilities in central roles.
  • Does not provide specific details regarding the gender breakdown of the research team.

AI Analysis

The film functions primarily as a scientific and historical inquiry rather than a study of human identity politics. Its value lies in challenging historical narratives regarding the treatment of non-human subjects and the ethics of Western scientific institutions. While the documentary lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ or disabled human characters, it engages with complex themes of colonial-era specimen collection and the commodification of nature. The narrative structure works to disrupt celebrity myths to reveal systemic realities of captivity. Ultimately, the diversity present is found in its potential to critique imperialist frameworks and the movement of wildlife from the Global South to Western museums.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.