You are here:

We

Name: We
Director: Shelly Silver
Released: 1990
Duration: 4 min

Representation Score

4.5/10

Fair

1990

Director

Shelly Silver

Runtime

4 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Shelly Silver’s experimental short serves as a conceptual critique of systemic viewing habits. It avoids traditional character-driven clichés, opting instead to use graphic dynamism to deconstruct established visual hierarchies and the mechanics of the gaze. The film excels in its theoretical commitment to disrupting gendered power dynamics. By centering its narrative on the subversion of phallocentrism, it moves away from dominant-group-centered storytelling in favor of a multi-perspectival approach. However, the work's focus on semiotics and perception leaves little room for concrete representation of race or disability. While it challenges social constructs, it does not provide specific visibility for these underrepresented identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does We have LGBTQ+ representation?

Good

The film focuses on challenging traditional views of sexuality and masculinity through its exploration of fetishism and phallocentrism. It disrupts the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender by questioning the male gaze and promoting alternative perspectives.

How does We portray gender?

Good

The film actively works to dismantle traditional masculine dominance by targeting phallocentrism. It prioritizes deconstructing the male gaze to elevate alternative viewpoints and challenge conventional authority.

How racially and ethnically diverse is We?

Minimal

The available information provides no details regarding the ethnic composition or casting of the film. The focus remains on perception and gendered semiotics rather than racialized identity.

How does We represent religion and culture?

Good

The film critiques societal assumptions and established modes of interpretation. It emphasizes contradictory views of perception and subjective relativism, challenging the idea of a singular social truth.

Does We include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence to suggest that physical disability or neurodivergence are central themes. The film does not appear to address these elements within its conceptual framework.

Present on Screen

Strong commitment to dismantling traditional gender hierarchies and the male gaze.
Uses theoretical frameworks effectively to challenge traditional visual structures.
Engages in sophisticated critiques of societal assumptions and objective social truths.

Limited or Absent

Lacks specific information or visibility regarding racial and ethnic diversity.
Provides no evidence of representation for neurodivergence or physical disability.
Relies on abstract semiotics rather than character-driven narratives to convey its themes.

Official Synopsis

A short, graphically dynamic work contrasting contradictory views of perception and interpretation, by way of society's assumptions vis-a-vis phallocentrism and fetishism.

How are these scores produced? →