You are here:

Soylent Green

Name: Soylent Green
Director: Richard Fleischer
Released: 1973
Duration: 97 min

Representation Score

5.9/10

Fair

1973

Director

Richard Fleischer

Runtime

97 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Soylent Green is a critical look at societal issues, focusing on socio-political commentary rather than diverse representation. Though it lacks LGBTQ+ and female characters, it excels in depicting a multicultural urban underclass in a dystopian setting. The film’s strength lies in its critique of corporate corruption and its portrayal of a diverse, struggling society. It uses the environment to reflect the degradation of the human condition. Overall, the film’s impact stems from its skepticism of authority and its depiction of a crowded, heterogeneous society fighting against corporate oppression.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Soylent Green have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or those with non-traditional gender identities. The story focuses solely on a homogeneous group facing biological and economic hardships.

How does Soylent Green portray gender?

Limited

The narrative adheres to traditional noir themes, focusing on a male protagonist. Female characters mainly serve to provide emotional support for the main character’s journey.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Soylent Green?

Good

The film portrays a multicultural New York City, emphasizing the diversity of its inhabitants. The setting highlights a mix of cultures and backgrounds within a crowded urban environment.

How does Soylent Green represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The movie critiques Western institutions and corporate greed. It presents corporations as oppressive forces that reduce individuals to mere resources.

Does Soylent Green include disability representation?

Fair

The film shows the physical and mental impacts of environmental collapse. Characters exhibit signs of systemic decline, but disability is not a primary factor in their actions.

Present on Screen

Effective portrayal of a diverse, multicultural urban underclass.
Sophisticated critique of corporate corruption and institutional morality.
Strong narrative deconstruction of human value and societal issues.

Limited or Absent

Lack of LGBTQ+ representation or non-traditional gender identities.
Reliance on traditional, male-centric noir themes and gender hierarchies.
Limited opportunities for characters with physical or mental disabilities.

Official Synopsis

In the year 2022, overcrowding, pollution, and resource depletion have reduced society’s leaders to finding food for the teeming masses. The answer is Soylent Green.

How are these scores produced? →