New Showbiz

You are here:
Downsizing

Downsizing

2017

R

Director

Alexander Payne

Runtime

135 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A kindly occupational therapist undergoes a new procedure to be shrunken to four inches tall so that he and his wife can help save the planet and afford a nice lifestyle at the same time.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.3/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film does not center on LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender roles. It remains within conventional relational frameworks without actively engaging with or critiquing heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Good

Audrey disrupts traditional hierarchies by serving as the primary plot catalyst. Her agency in demanding a radical socioeconomic departure challenges the trope of the passive female companion.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

Hong Chau occupies a central, high-agency role that departs from homogeneous casting norms. The narrative integrates her character into the core emotional and structural elements of the story.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film offers a profound critique of hyper-capitalism and Western institutions. It portrays the downsized community as an exclusionary enclave that reinforces extreme wealth inequality and systemic decay.

Disability Representation

Good

Characters utilizing mobility aids are visible within the downsized community. These portrayals are integrated into the social fabric, presenting disability as a standard aspect of lived experience.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional gender roles by positioning Audrey as a decisive, high-agency protagonist.
  • Provides a sophisticated critique of hyper-capitalism and the exclusionary nature of wealth.
  • Integrates disability into the social fabric naturally, avoiding 'inspiration porn' tropes.
  • Features meaningful racial diversity through a central, impactful role for Hong Chau.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks engagement with LGBTQ+ identities or queer perspectives.
  • Maintains conventional relational frameworks without critiquing heteronormativity.

AI Analysis

Downsizing uses a science-fiction premise to conduct a rigorous analysis of class and systemic inequity. It excels at deconstructing capitalist ideals, showing how the pursuit of a 'smaller' life can become a tool for the ultra-wealthy to bypass environmental consequences. The film's strength lies in its subversion of traditional domestic roles and its nuanced exploration of identity within a stratified society. By centering high-agency characters from diverse backgrounds, it avoids many common tropes of peripheral representation. However, the narrative remains conservative regarding LGBTQ+ themes. While it provides a sophisticated critique of economic structures, it does not expand its social commentary to include queer perspectives or non-cisnormative identities.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

  • Best Religious & Cultural Representation in Film
  • Religious & Cultural Representation in Drama

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Advantageous

Advantageous

2015

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.8 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.