You are here:
Here We Go Round the Mulberry Bush

Here We Go Round the Mulberry Bush

1968

Not Rated

Director

Clive Donner

Runtime

96 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Jamie McGregor is a virginal sixth-former in suburbia delivering groceries for the local supermarket, but he is more interested in other matters - Mary, Linda, Paula, and Caroline. He tries to seduce the girls of his dreams in the swinging sixties.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.3/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film adheres to the heteronormative structures of the late 1960s. It lacks any depiction of same-sex intimacy or non-cisnormative gender identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

Female characters exhibit increasing agency and autonomy within the sexual revolution. The narrative explores their ability to navigate romantic complexities beyond traditional domesticity.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast is predominantly white, reflecting the demographic homogeneity of 1968 British suburbia. The story does not incorporate diverse racial or ethnic perspectives.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film captures the cultural transition of the youth movement and its irreverence. It highlights the friction between individual desire and established social decorum.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible presence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The focus remains entirely on the able-bodied pursuits of the youth.

Strengths

  • Captures the era's shifting social mores and the friction between tradition and youth counterculture.
  • Portrays female characters with a degree of autonomy and independence during the sexual revolution.
  • Effectively documents the departure from rigid traditional decorum in favor of social fluidity.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex romantic interests.
  • Fails to incorporate diverse racial or ethnic perspectives within the narrative.
  • Provides no visibility or character-driven elements regarding disability.

AI Analysis

The film serves as a period piece documenting the shifting social mores of the Swinging Sixties. It finds its strength in capturing the era's burgeoning female agency and the deconstruction of rigid social decorum through its focus on the youth counterculture. However, the work is limited by the demographic constraints of its time. It lacks racial diversity and provides no representation for LGBTQ+ individuals or people with disabilities, remaining firmly rooted in a traditional, homogenous framework. Ultimately, the film's value is observational rather than intersectional. It reflects the social evolution of 1968 without attempting to expand its scope through diverse casting or systemic critique.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.